Creation and consolidation of revista brasileira de psiquiatria (RBP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2236-918x-6-6-4Keywords:
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP), Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP), editors, impact factorAbstract
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) was created in the same year as Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP), i.e., 50 years ago. However, the journal was disconti nued for some ti me, resulti ng in a change of its ti tle to Revista da ABP and later to Revista ABPAPAL, remaining so for 20 years. Notwithstanding, the journal has always been an offi cial publicati on of ABP. As the history of the journal is intertwined with the history of the Associati on, several ABP presidents have been menti oned – all of whom have brought forward substanti al changes and improvements to the journal –, as well as many editors who have devoted their eff orts to consolidati ng RBP, presently a journal with substanti al nati onal and internati onal recogniti on.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bueno JR. Memória das publicações da ABP. Psiquiatria Hoje. 2003;4:24-6.
Piccinini WJ. Apontamentos sobre a história da Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2016 Oct 04]. polbr.med.br/ano05/wal0405.php
Fernández LMM, Alonso MI, López AM, Valenzuela JV. Consistency between indexers in the LILAC database (Lati n American and Caribbean HealthScience Literature). Informati on Research. 2013;18(4) paper 601. http://InformationR.net/ir/18-4/paper601.html
Calil HM, Blay SL. Revista da Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (Rev. ABP) 20 anos [editorial]. Rev ABP-APAL. 1997;19. [Errata em Rev ABP-APAL. 1998;20(1).]
Packer AL, Cop N, Luccisano A, Ramalho A, Spinal E. SciELO-15 anos de acesso aberto: um estudo analítico sobre acesso aberto e comunicação cientí fi ca. Paris: Unesco; 2014.
Garfi eld E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295:90-3.
Bloudoff -Indelicato M. NIH metric that assesses arti cle impact sti rs debate. The US biomedical funding agency is using the metric to evaluate funded research. Nature. 2015. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.18734
Callaway E. Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric. Nature. 2016;535:210-211. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20224
Editorial. Time to remodel the journal impact factor. Nature. 2016;535:466. doi:10.1038/535466a
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
