Adult Concentration Inventory (ACI) versão em português do Brasil: adaptação transcultural e estudo de validação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2022.v12.421Palavras-chave:
transtorno de déficit de atenção e hiperatividade, adulto, autorrelato, psicometria, Sluggish Cognitive TempoResumo
Introdução: O Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) designa um grupo de sintomas relacionados com deficiências em domínios valiosos da vida. Objetivos: Os objetivos foram traduzir, adaptar e validar uma escala psicometricamente informada de SCT, o Adult Concentration Inventory (ACI), para o contexto brasileiro. Método: A escala foi traduzida, retrotraduzida e avaliada por um painel de especialistas. Após a análise de equivalência semântica, 446 participantes (295 mulheres) com idades entre 18 e 65 anos (M = 34,99, DP = 10,7) responderam a uma pesquisa na Internet. Foi realizada uma Análise Fatorial Exploratória (EFA) com os itens do ACI, Adult Self Report Scale (ASRS-18), o Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ-20) para avaliar a validade convergente e discriminante dos itens do ACI. Uma Análise Fatorial Confirmatória (CFA) foi realizada para testar a estrutura latente do ACI. Correlações entre ACI, ASRS-18 e SRQ-20 também foram calculadas. Resultados: As análises de equivalência semântica dos especialistas apontaram 85% de concordância média. A EFA com ACI, ASRS-18 e SRQ-20 apresentou 10 itens ACI com validade convergente e discriminante aceitável. A solução mais adequada no CFA foi o modelo de um fator (RMSEA = 0,039 [IC90%: 0,0 – 0,09]; CFI = 0,997; TLI = 0,996). A confiabilidade foi satisfatória (α = 0,920). As correlações entre as medidas do ACI e a desatenção do ASRS-18 foram altas. Por outro lado, as correlações com a hiperatividade-impulsividade do ASRS-18 foram de média intensidade e quando controladas por desatenção tornaram-se não significativas. Conclusão: No geral, os resultados preliminares mostraram a confiabilidade e validade da versão em português do Brasil do ACI. Novos estudos devem se concentrar em determinar a generalização e a invariância de medição desses achados.
Downloads
Métricas
Referências
Becker SP, Leopold DR, Burns GL, Jarrett MA, Langberg JM, Marshall SA, McBurnett K, Waschbusch DA, Willcutt EG (2016). The internal, external, and diagnostic validity of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: a meta-analysis and critical review. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2016;55(3): 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2015.12.006
Ekinci O, İpek Baş SA, Ekinci N, Doğan Öİ, Yaşöz C, Adak İ. Sluggish cognitive tempo is associated with autistic traits and anxiety disorder symptoms in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry. 2021; 43(2):153-159. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2020-0965
Brewe AM, Simmons GL, Capriola-Hall NN, White SW. Sluggish cognitive tempo: an examination of clinical correlates for adults with autism. Autism. 2020;24(6):1373–1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319900422
Mayes SD, Calhoun SL, Waschbusch DA. Sluggish cognitive tempo in autism, ADHD, and neurotypical child samples. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2020;79:101678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101678
Becker SP, Marshall SA, McBurnett K. Sluggish Cognitive Tempo in abnormal child psychology: an historical overview and introduction to the special section. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2014;42(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9825-x
Becker SP, Burns GL, Smith ZR, Langberg JM. Sluggish Cognitive Tempo in adolescents with and without ADHD: differentiation from adolescent-reported ADHD inattention and unique associations with internalizing domains. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 2020; 48(3):391–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-019-00603-9
Fredrick JW, Kofler MJ, Jarrett MA, Burns GL, Luebbe AM, Garner AA, Harmon SL, Becker SP. Sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD symptoms in relation to task-unrelated thought: examining unique links with mind-wandering and rumination. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2020;123:95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.01.016
Flannery AJ, Luebbe AM, Becker SP. Sluggish Cognitive Tempo is associated with poorer study skills, more executive functioning deficits, and greater impairment in college students. J. Clin. Psychol. 2016;73:1091-1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22406
Kamradt JM, Momany AM, Nikolas MA. Sluggish Cognitive Tempo symptoms contribute to heterogeneity in Adult Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2018;40(2):206–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9631-9
Barkley RA. Distinguishing sluggish cognitive tempo from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2012;121(4):978–990. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023961
Becker SP, Burns GL, Garner AA, Jarrett MA, Luebbe AM, Epstein JN, Willcutt EG. Sluggish cognitive tempo in adults: psychometric validation of the adult concentration inventory. Psychological Assessment. 2018;30(3):296–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000476
Bolat H, Ercan ES, Ünsel-Bolat G, Tahillioğlu A, Yazici KU, Bacanli A, Pariltay E, Jafari DA, Kosova B, Özgül S, Rohde LA, Akin, H. DRD4 genotyping may differentiate symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and sluggish cognitive tempo. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020;42(6):630-637. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0630
Fırat S, Gul H, Aysev A. An open-label trial of methylphenidate treating sluggish cognitive tempo, inattention, and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms among 6- to 12-year-old ADHD children: what are the predictors of treatment response at home and school? Journal of Attention Disorders. 2021;25(9):1321-1330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054720902846
McBurnett K, Clemow D, Williams D, Villodas M, Wietecha L, Barkley R. Atomoxetine-related change in sluggish cognitive tempo is partially independent of change in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder inattentive symptoms. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. 2017;27(1):38-42. https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2016.0115
Becker SP. Systematic review: assessment of sluggish cognitive tempo over the past decade. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2020;60(6):690-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2020.10.016
International Test Commission. ITC. The ITC huidelines for translating and adapting tests. 2nd. edition. 2017. http://www.InTestCom.org https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health. 2005;8(2):94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
American Psychiatric Association. APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text rev. Washington, DC: APA; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890423349
Adler LA, Spencer T, Faraone SV, Kessler RC, Howes MJ, Biederman J, Secnik K. Validity of pilot adult ADHD Self- Report Scale (ASRS) to rate adult ADHD symptoms. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry. 2006;18(3):145–148. https://doi.org/10.3109/10401230600801077
Mattos P, Segenreich D, Saboya E, Louzã M, Dias G, Romano M. Adaptação transcultural para o português da escala Adult Self-Report Scale para avaliação do transtorno de déficit de atenção/hiperatividade (TDAH) em adultos. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, São Paulo. 2006;33(4):188-194. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832006000400004
Harding T, De Arango V, Baltazar J, Climent C, Ibrahim H, Ladrido-Ignacio L, Wig N. Mental disorders in primary health care: a study of their frequency and diagnosis in four developing countries. Psychological Medicine. 1980;10(2):231-241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700043993
Mari JJ, Williams P. A validity study of a psychiatric screening questionnaire (SRQ-20) in primary care in the city of Sao Paulo. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 1986;148(1):23-26.
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.148.1.23
Paraventi F, Cogo-Moreira H, Paula CS, Mari JJ. Psychometric properties of the self-reporting questionnaire (SRQ-20): measurement invariance across women from Brazilian community settings. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2015;58:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.020
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International Journal of Medical Education. 2011;2:53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Colwell SR. (2016). The composite reliability calculator. Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4298.088
Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-Seva U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: origins, development and future directions. Psicothema. 2017; 29(2):236-241. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304
Asparouhov T, Muthen B. Simple second order chi-square correction. 2010. (Unpublished manuscript). https://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. https://www.R-project.org/
Rosseel Y. “lavaan”: an R Package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software. 2012;48(2):1–36. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
Watkins MW. Exploratory factor analysis: a guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology. 2018;44(3):219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research. 2006;99(6):323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999;6(1): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Takeda T, Burns GL, Jiang Y, Becker SP, McBurnett K. Psychometric properties of a sluggish cognitive tempo scale in Japanese adults with and without ADHD. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders. 2019;11(4):353-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-019-00300-z
Jung SH, Lee S, Burns GL, Becker SP. Internal and external validity of self-report and parent-report measures of sluggish cognitive tempo in South Korean adolescents. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2021;43:355-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09821-8
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Leandro Fernandes Malloy-Diniz, Victor Polignano Godoy, Lorena Paula Silva, Alexandre Luiz Oliveira Serpa
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria permite que o (s) autor (es) mantenha(m) seus direitos autorais sem restrições. Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria é regida pela licença CC-BY-NC
