Historiographical reflections on psychiatry and neurology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2025.v15.1527Keywords:
Historiography, psychiatry, Neurology, Comprehension, interdisciplinarity, neuroscienceAbstract
The historiography of psychiatry, neurology, and neuroscience reveals a deep interconnection between past and present. This article explores how an understanding of historical contexts is essential for comprehending the evolution and current state of these fields. By synthesizing diverse historiographical traditions, this paper offers a novel framework for understanding the shared intellectual and institutional roots of these disciplines. It argues that integrating historical perspectives into psychiatric and neurological training enriches clinical practice, policy-making, and scholarly reflection. The examination reveals the interconnected evolution of psychiatry, neurology, and neuroscience. The historiography of these disciplines informs medical practice and policy, emphasizing the need to revisit traditional narratives, integrate diverse viewpoints, and incorporate historical insight into professional training. Acknowledging certain limitations, future research should aim to broaden primary-source bases and incorporate diverse perspectives. Overall, this historiographical exploration enhances our understanding of these interwoven disciplines and contributes to advancing patient care and scholarly reflection.
Downloads
Metrics
References
1. Barbara JG, Lorch MP, Stahnisch FW. History of neuroscience. Front Neuroanat. 2020;14:46. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2020.00046 PMid:32903479 PMCid:PMC7437351
2. Brown RE. Why study the history of neuroscience? Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;13:82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00082 PMid:31191266 PMCid:PMC6539194
3. MacDougald Q, Ruffalo ML. History of psychiatry: its relevance in training and beyond. Psychiatric Times [Internet]. 2024 Jun 10 [accessed 2024 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/history-of-psychiatry-its-relevance-in-training-and-beyond
4. Ash G, Hilton C, Freudenthal R, Stephenson T, Ikkos G. History of psychiatry in the curriculum? history is part of life and life is part of history: why psychiatrists need to understand it better. Br J Psychiatry. 2020;217(4):535-36. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.64 PMid:32241320
5. Rauzy JB, Cossara S, Zhang X. Cartesian epistemology: an introduction. Synthese. 2018;195:4667-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1705-z
6. Fonseca M. Análise crítica da obra de António Damásio "O erro de Descartes" ou o erro de Damásio sobre "O erro de Descartes". Millennium. 1996;2:53-7.
7. Kendler KS, Tabb K, Wright J. The emergence of psychiatry: 1650-1850. Am J Psychiatry. 2022;179(5):329-35. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.21060614 PMid:35331024
8. Foucault M. Madness and civilization. London: Routledge; 1971.
9. Scull A. Madness in civilization: a cultural history of insanity, from the bible to freud, from the madhouse to modern medicine. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2015. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77hvc
10. Szasz TS. The myth of mental illness: foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Hoeber-Harper; 1961.
11. Laing RD. The divided self: an existential study in sanity and madness. London: Tavistock Publications; 1960.
12. Goffman E. Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor Books; 1961.
13. Basaglia F. L'istituzione negata: rapporto da un ospedale psichiatrico. Torino: Einaudi; 1968.
14. Sedgwick P. Psycho politics: Laing, Foucault, Goffman, Szasz, and the future of mass psychiatry. New York: Harper & Row; 1982.
15. Levín SA. The crisis of scientific paradigm in modern psychiatry and a look to the future. PCN Rep. 2025;4(2):e70132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70132 PMid:40487976 PMCid:PMC12145659
16. Antić A. A 'Sisyphean task': recent developments in the historiography of mental health. Contemp Eur Hist. 2021;30(4):562-73.
17. Marková IS. Historical epistemology: a research approach in psychiatry. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021;55(1):288-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09589-2 PMid:33277673 PMCid:PMC8139918
18. Pichot P. The history of psychiatry as a medical specialty. In: Gelder MG, López-Ibor JJ, Andreasen NC, editors. New Oxford textbook of psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199696758.003.0005
19. Shorter E. History of psychiatry. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008;21(6):593-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830aba12 PMid:18852567 PMCid:PMC3714299
20. Rosen G. Madness in society: chapters in the historical sociology of mental illness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1968.
21. Berrios G. The history of mental symptoms: descriptive psychopathology since the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526725 PMCid:PMC486678
22. Torrey EF. Surviving schizophrenia: a family manual. New York: Harper & Row; 1983.
23. Lieberman JA. Shrinks: the untold story of psychiatry. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 2015.
24. Shorter E. A History of psychiatry: from the era of the asylum to the age of Prozac. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.
25. Tyler K, York GK, Steinberg DA, Okun MS, Steinbach M, Satran R, Fine EJ, Manteghi T, Bleck TP, Swanson JW, Mishra S, Meador KJ, Clifford DB, Toole JF, Melson L. Part 2: history of 20th century neurology: decade by decade. Ann Neurol. 2003;53(S4):S27-S45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.1346 PMid:12722088
26. Da Mota Gomes M. História da neurologia mundial e seus protagonistas. Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital; 2021.
27. Temkin O. The falling sickness: a history of epilepsy from the greeks to the beginnings of modern neurology. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1971.
28. Finger S. Origins of neuroscience: a history of explorations into brain function. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195065039.001.0001
29. Scull AL, Jacyna S, Casper ST. The Neurological patient in History. Rochester: University of Rochester Press; 2012.
30. Braslow JT, Marder SR. History of Psychopharmacology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:25-50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095514 PMid:30786241
31. Da Mota Gomes M, Mendlowicz MV, Nardi AE. Psychiatric nosological historiography-Part II: psychopharmacology and somatogenic perspectives. Debates Psiquiatr. 2023;13:1-15. https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2023.v13.1032
32. Newman MG, LaFreniere LS, Shin KE. Cognitive-behavioral therapies in historical perspective. In: Consoli AJ, Beutler LE, Bongar B, editors. Comprehensive textbook of psychotherapy: Theory and practice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017. P. 61-75. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eZvCx7nBwOB8kVC2irXfxNsFzWPI2ySY/view?usp=sharing
33. Keshavan MS, Song SH, Zhang Y, Lizano P. Neuroscience in pictures: 1. History of psychiatric neuroscience. Asian J Psychiatr. 2024;92:103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103869 PMid:38157712
34. Casper ST. History and neuroscience: an integrative legacy. Isis. 2014;105(1):123-32. https://doi.org/10.1086/675554 PMid:24855875
35. Freeborn A. The history of the brain and mind sciences. History of the Human Sciences. 2019;32(3):145-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695118815554
36. Hoff P, Maatz A, Vetter JS. Diagnosis as dialogue: historical and current perspectives. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020;22(1):27-35. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/phoff PMid:32699503 PMCid:PMC7365291
37. Bermejo-Pareja F, Del Ser T. Controversial past, splendid present, unpredictable future: a brief review of alzheimer disease history. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2):536. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020536 PMid:38256670 PMCid:PMC10816332
38. Squire LR. The legacy of patient H.M. for neuroscience. Neuron. 2009;61(1):6-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.023 PMid:19146808 PMCid:PMC2649674
39. Langer KG. The history of amnesia: a review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021;21:40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-021-01126-x PMid:34110519
40. Telles-Correia D, Moreira AL, Gonçalves JS. Hallucinations and related concepts-their conceptual background. Front Psychol. 2015;6:991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00991 PMid:26283978 PMCid:PMC4515540
41. Da Mota Gomes M, Mathias C, Nardi AE. Transnational evolution of psychiatry and neurology: a European perspective from the Enlightenment to the early 20th century. Debates em Psiquiat. 2025;15:1-29. https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2025.v15.1379
42. Kipping M, Wadhwani RD, Bucheli M. Analyzing and interpreting historical sources: A basic methodology. In: Bucheli M, Wadhwani RD, editors. Organizations in time: history, theory, methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 305-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646890.003.0013
43. Da Mota Gomes M, Mendlowicz MV, Nardi AE. Psychiatric nosological historiography-Part I: until the raising and fall of the psychodynamic theory. Debates Psiquiatr. 2023;13:1-25.https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2023.v13.1031
44. Millard C, Wallis J, editors. Sources in the history of psychiatry, from 1800 to the presente: Routledge Guides to using historical sources. Illustrated edition. Abingdon: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087694
45. Gomory T, Cohen D, Kirk SA. Madness or mental illness? revisiting historians of psychiatry. Curr Psychol. 2013;32:119-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9168-3
46. Rosner R. Historiography and historians of neuroscience: towards diversity in the ISHN. J Hist Neurosci. 1999;8(3):264-68. https://doi.org/10.1076/jhin.8.3.264.1829 PMid:11624157
47. Hess V, Majerus B. Writing the history of psychiatry in the 20th century. Hist Psychiatry. 2011;22(86 Pt 2):139-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X11404791 PMid:21877383
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marleide de Mota Gomes, Cátia Mathias , Antonio Egidio Nardi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
