Reflexiones historiográficas sobre los caminos entrelazados de la psiquiatría y la neurología

Autores/as

  • Marleide da Mota Gomes Professora Titular, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Neurologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8889-2573
  • Cátia Mathias Bibliotecária-Chefe, Laboratório de História da Psiquiatria, Neurologia e Saúde Mental, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8321-1393
  • Antonio Egidio Nardi Professor Titular, Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2152-4669

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2025.v15.1527

Palabras clave:

historiografia, psiquiatria, neurologia, interdisciplinariedad, neurociencia

Resumen

La historiografía de la psiquiatría, la neurología y las neurociencias revela una profunda interconexión entre el pasado y el presente. Este artículo explora cómo la comprensión de los contextos históricos es esencial para entender la evolución y el estado actual de estos campos. Al sintetizar diversas tradiciones historiográficas, este trabajo ofrece un marco novedoso para comprender las raíces intelectuales e institucionales compartidas de estas disciplinas. Se argumenta que la integración de perspectivas históricas en la formación psiquiátrica y neurológica enriquece la práctica clínica, la elaboración de políticas y la reflexión académica. El análisis revela la evolución interconectada de la psiquiatría, la neurología y las neurociencias, demostrando cómo la historiografía de estas disciplinas informa la práctica médica y las políticas públicas. Se destaca la necesidad de revisitar narrativas tradicionales, integrar puntos de vista diversos e incorporar conocimientos históricos en la formación profesional. Reconociendo ciertas limitaciones, futuras investigaciones deben buscar ampliar las bases de fuentes primarias e incluir perspectivas diversas. En definitiva, esta exploración historiográfica profundiza nuestra comprensión de estas disciplinas entrelazadas y contribuye al avance del cuidado al paciente y la reflexión académica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Marleide da Mota Gomes, Professora Titular, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Neurologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

Cátia Mathias , Bibliotecária-Chefe, Laboratório de História da Psiquiatria, Neurologia e Saúde Mental, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

Antonio Egidio Nardi , Professor Titular, Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

Citas

1. Barbara JG, Lorch MP, Stahnisch FW. History of neuroscience. Front Neuroanat. 2020;14:46. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2020.00046 PMid:32903479 PMCid:PMC7437351

2. Brown RE. Why study the history of neuroscience? Front Behav Neurosci. 2019;13:82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00082 PMid:31191266 PMCid:PMC6539194

3. MacDougald Q, Ruffalo ML. History of psychiatry: its relevance in training and beyond. Psychiatric Times [Internet]. 2024 Jun 10 [accessed 2024 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/history-of-psychiatry-its-relevance-in-training-and-beyond

4. Ash G, Hilton C, Freudenthal R, Stephenson T, Ikkos G. History of psychiatry in the curriculum? history is part of life and life is part of history: why psychiatrists need to understand it better. Br J Psychiatry. 2020;217(4):535-36. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.64 PMid:32241320

5. Rauzy JB, Cossara S, Zhang X. Cartesian epistemology: an introduction. Synthese. 2018;195:4667-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1705-z

6. Fonseca M. Análise crítica da obra de António Damásio "O erro de Descartes" ou o erro de Damásio sobre "O erro de Descartes". Millennium. 1996;2:53-7.

7. Kendler KS, Tabb K, Wright J. The emergence of psychiatry: 1650-1850. Am J Psychiatry. 2022;179(5):329-35. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.21060614 PMid:35331024

8. Foucault M. Madness and civilization. London: Routledge; 1971.

9. Scull A. Madness in civilization: a cultural history of insanity, from the bible to freud, from the madhouse to modern medicine. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2015. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77hvc

10. Szasz TS. The myth of mental illness: foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Hoeber-Harper; 1961.

11. Laing RD. The divided self: an existential study in sanity and madness. London: Tavistock Publications; 1960.

12. Goffman E. Asylums: essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor Books; 1961.

13. Basaglia F. L'istituzione negata: rapporto da un ospedale psichiatrico. Torino: Einaudi; 1968.

14. Sedgwick P. Psycho politics: Laing, Foucault, Goffman, Szasz, and the future of mass psychiatry. New York: Harper & Row; 1982.

15. Levín SA. The crisis of scientific paradigm in modern psychiatry and a look to the future. PCN Rep. 2025;4(2):e70132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70132 PMid:40487976 PMCid:PMC12145659

16. Antić A. A 'Sisyphean task': recent developments in the historiography of mental health. Contemp Eur Hist. 2021;30(4):562-73.

17. Marková IS. Historical epistemology: a research approach in psychiatry. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021;55(1):288-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09589-2 PMid:33277673 PMCid:PMC8139918

18. Pichot P. The history of psychiatry as a medical specialty. In: Gelder MG, López-Ibor JJ, Andreasen NC, editors. New Oxford textbook of psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199696758.003.0005

19. Shorter E. History of psychiatry. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008;21(6):593-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830aba12 PMid:18852567 PMCid:PMC3714299

20. Rosen G. Madness in society: chapters in the historical sociology of mental illness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1968.

21. Berrios G. The history of mental symptoms: descriptive psychopathology since the nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526725 PMCid:PMC486678

22. Torrey EF. Surviving schizophrenia: a family manual. New York: Harper & Row; 1983.

23. Lieberman JA. Shrinks: the untold story of psychiatry. New York: Little, Brown and Company; 2015.

24. Shorter E. A History of psychiatry: from the era of the asylum to the age of Prozac. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1997.

25. Tyler K, York GK, Steinberg DA, Okun MS, Steinbach M, Satran R, Fine EJ, Manteghi T, Bleck TP, Swanson JW, Mishra S, Meador KJ, Clifford DB, Toole JF, Melson L. Part 2: history of 20th century neurology: decade by decade. Ann Neurol. 2003;53(S4):S27-S45. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.1346 PMid:12722088

26. Da Mota Gomes M. História da neurologia mundial e seus protagonistas. Rio de Janeiro: Letra Capital; 2021.

27. Temkin O. The falling sickness: a history of epilepsy from the greeks to the beginnings of modern neurology. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1971.

28. Finger S. Origins of neuroscience: a history of explorations into brain function. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195065039.001.0001

29. Scull AL, Jacyna S, Casper ST. The Neurological patient in History. Rochester: University of Rochester Press; 2012.

30. Braslow JT, Marder SR. History of Psychopharmacology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:25-50. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095514 PMid:30786241

31. Da Mota Gomes M, Mendlowicz MV, Nardi AE. Psychiatric nosological historiography-Part II: psychopharmacology and somatogenic perspectives. Debates Psiquiatr. 2023;13:1-15. https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2023.v13.1032

32. Newman MG, LaFreniere LS, Shin KE. Cognitive-behavioral therapies in historical perspective. In: Consoli AJ, Beutler LE, Bongar B, editors. Comprehensive textbook of psychotherapy: Theory and practice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017. P. 61-75. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eZvCx7nBwOB8kVC2irXfxNsFzWPI2ySY/view?usp=sharing

33. Keshavan MS, Song SH, Zhang Y, Lizano P. Neuroscience in pictures: 1. History of psychiatric neuroscience. Asian J Psychiatr. 2024;92:103869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103869 PMid:38157712

34. Casper ST. History and neuroscience: an integrative legacy. Isis. 2014;105(1):123-32. https://doi.org/10.1086/675554 PMid:24855875

35. Freeborn A. The history of the brain and mind sciences. History of the Human Sciences. 2019;32(3):145-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695118815554

36. Hoff P, Maatz A, Vetter JS. Diagnosis as dialogue: historical and current perspectives. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020;22(1):27-35. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/phoff PMid:32699503 PMCid:PMC7365291

37. Bermejo-Pareja F, Del Ser T. Controversial past, splendid present, unpredictable future: a brief review of alzheimer disease history. J Clin Med. 2024;13(2):536. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020536 PMid:38256670 PMCid:PMC10816332

38. Squire LR. The legacy of patient H.M. for neuroscience. Neuron. 2009;61(1):6-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.023 PMid:19146808 PMCid:PMC2649674

39. Langer KG. The history of amnesia: a review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021;21:40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-021-01126-x PMid:34110519

40. Telles-Correia D, Moreira AL, Gonçalves JS. Hallucinations and related concepts-their conceptual background. Front Psychol. 2015;6:991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00991 PMid:26283978 PMCid:PMC4515540

41. Da Mota Gomes M, Mathias C, Nardi AE. Transnational evolution of psychiatry and neurology: a European perspective from the Enlightenment to the early 20th century. Debates em Psiquiat. 2025;15:1-29. https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2025.v15.1379

42. Kipping M, Wadhwani RD, Bucheli M. Analyzing and interpreting historical sources: A basic methodology. In: Bucheli M, Wadhwani RD, editors. Organizations in time: history, theory, methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 305-29. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646890.003.0013

43. Da Mota Gomes M, Mendlowicz MV, Nardi AE. Psychiatric nosological historiography-Part I: until the raising and fall of the psychodynamic theory. Debates Psiquiatr. 2023;13:1-25.https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2023.v13.1031

44. Millard C, Wallis J, editors. Sources in the history of psychiatry, from 1800 to the presente: Routledge Guides to using historical sources. Illustrated edition. Abingdon: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003087694

45. Gomory T, Cohen D, Kirk SA. Madness or mental illness? revisiting historians of psychiatry. Curr Psychol. 2013;32:119-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9168-3

46. Rosner R. Historiography and historians of neuroscience: towards diversity in the ISHN. J Hist Neurosci. 1999;8(3):264-68. https://doi.org/10.1076/jhin.8.3.264.1829 PMid:11624157

47. Hess V, Majerus B. Writing the history of psychiatry in the 20th century. Hist Psychiatry. 2011;22(86 Pt 2):139-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X11404791 PMid:21877383

Publicado

2025-12-30

Cómo citar

1.
Gomes M da M, Mathias C, Nardi AE. Reflexiones historiográficas sobre los caminos entrelazados de la psiquiatría y la neurología. Debates Psiquiatr. [Internet]. 30 de diciembre de 2025 [citado 18 de mayo de 2026];15:1-21, e1527. Disponible en: https://revistardp.org.br/revista/article/view/1527

Número

Sección

Artículo de revisión

Plaudit