Evidence-based management of return to work in common mental disorders: a roadmap for interventional practice and process coordination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2026.v16.1653Keywords:
return to work, mental disorders, sick leave, rehabilitation, occupational healthAbstract
Introduction: Common mental disorders are among the leading causes of prolonged work absence, and their incidence is rising rapidly, including in Brazil. A persistent gap separates symptom improvement from effective and sustainable return to work. Objective: To critically synthesize the evidence on the management of return to work of people on sick leave due to common mental disorders and to propose a practical, interventional and coordinated roadmap. Method: Critical narrative review with searches in six databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS) covering the last ten years, guided by criteria SANRA for the assessment of narrative reviews, with thematic synthesis and prudent characterization of the strength of the evidence. Results: Workers' expectations and self-efficacy robustly predict the outcome, at times beyond diagnostic severity. The psychosocial work environment predicts return even after adjustment for symptoms. Structured workplace contact and work-focused interventions shorten time to return, whereas clinical improvement alone is insufficient. Return is heterogeneous, with distinct trajectories and a relevant risk of relapse. Case coordination and digital tools are promising, though supported by still incipient evidence. Conclusion: Effective management requires shifting the focus from symptom remission to functional recovery, adjustment of job demands and coordination among stakeholders, with local validation of recommendations.
Downloads
Metrics
References
1. World Health Organization. Guidelines on mental health at work [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240053052
2. Victor M, Lau B, Ruud T. Predictors of return to work 6 months after the end of treatment in patients with common mental disorders: a cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(5):548-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9747-5 PMid:29234955 PMCid:PMC6096513
3. Victor M, Lau B, Ruud T. Predictors of return to work among patients in treatment for common mental disorders: a pre-post study. BMC Public Health. 2017;18(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4581-4 PMid:28720129
4. Observatório de Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho. Promoção do meio ambiente do trabalho guiada por dados [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério Público do Trabalho; Organização Internacional do Trabalho; 2025 [citado 2026 Jul 21]. Disponível em: https://smartlab.mpt.mp.br/sst
5. Macedo JWL, Silva AB. Afastamentos do trabalho no Brasil por transtornos mentais e comportamentais: o que revelam os números da Previdência Social? Rev Bras Estud Organ. 2018;3(1):39-49. https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/mepad/article/view/40644
6. Mikkelsen MB, Rosholm M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at enhancing return to work for sick-listed workers with common mental disorders, stress-related disorders, somatoform disorders and personality disorders. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75(9):675-86. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2018-105073 PMid:29954920
7. Green F, Matthews LR, Hancock N. Return-to-work experiences of individuals with common mental disorders within disability-based insurance systems explored within a mental health recovery framework: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2025;47(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2331069 PMid:38511391
8. Björk Brämberg E, Holmgren K, Bültmann U, Gyllensten H, Hagberg J, Sandman L, Bergström G. Increasing return-to-work among people on sick leave due to common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a problem-solving intervention versus care-as-usual conducted in the Swedish primary health care system (PROSA). BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):889. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5816-8 PMid:30021545 PMCid:PMC6052693
9. Corbière M, Mazaniello-Chézol M, Lecomte T, Guay S, Panaccio A, Giguère CÉ. Web-enhanced return-to-work coordination for employees with common mental disorders: reduction of sick leave duration and relapse. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):676. https://10.1186/s12889-025-21716-5
10. de Vries H, Fishta A, Weikert B, Rodriguez Sanchez A, Wegewitz U. Determinants of sickness absence and return to work among employees with common mental disorders: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(3):393-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9730-1 PMid:28980107 PMCid:PMC6096498
11. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA - a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8 PMid:30962953
12. Sikora A, Stegmann R, Schröder UB, Schulz IL, Wegewitz U, Bültmann U. Work ability during the return to work process: results from a mixed methods follow-up study among employees with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2026;36(1):248-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10262-3 PMid:39915346 PMCid:PMC12906556
13. van Beurden KM, Joosen MCW, Terluin B, van Weeghel J, van der Klink JJL, Brouwers EPM. Use of a mental health guideline by occupational physicians and associations with return to work in workers sick-listed due to common mental disorders: a retrospective cohort study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(22):2623-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1347209 PMid:28683580
14. Pedersen P, Søgaard HJ, Yde BF, Labriola M, Nohr EA, Jensen C. Psychoeducation to facilitate return to work in individuals on sick leave and at risk of having a mental disorder: protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1288. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1288 PMid:25516423 PMCid:PMC4300682
15. Toropova A, Björk Brämberg E, Bergström G. Return to work trajectories of Swedish employees on sick-leave due to common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2025;35(3):479-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10216-9 PMid:38907784 PMCid:PMC12361341
16. Lau B, Shiryaeva O, Ruud T, Victor M. What are they returning to? Psychosocial work environment as a predictor of returning to work among employees in treatment for common mental disorders: a prospective observational pre-post study. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215354 PMid:31017935 PMCid:PMC6481810
17. Ayala-García A, Serra L, Rodriguez-Arjona D, Benavides FG, Utzet M. Understanding Return to Work After a Cancer-Related Sickness Absence. Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators Among all Relevant Stakeholders. Psychooncology. 2024;33(12):e70036. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70036 PMid:39643597 PMCid:PMC11624155
18. Mernyi L, Hölzle P, Hamann J. Psychiatric inpatient treatment and return to work. Psychiatr Prax. 2022;49(6):314-21. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101901 PMid:28499318
19. Muntanelli BR, Silva-Junior JS. Predictors of sustained return to work after sick leave due to mental disorders. Rev Bras Med Trab. 2025;23(2):e20251360. https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2025-1360 PMid:40969589 PMCid:PMC12443380
20. Miranda CB, Silva-Junior JS, Fernandes GA, Fischer FM. Trends in the cumulative incidence of vocational rehabilitation indicators in Brazil, 2007-2016. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113952 PMid:32503137 PMCid:PMC7313003
21. Rashid M, Kristofferzon ML, Nilsson A, Heiden M. Factors associated with return to work among people on work absence due to long-term neck or back pain: a narrative systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e014939. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014939 PMid:28674139 PMCid:PMC5734441
22. Axén I, Björk Brämberg E, Vaez M, Lundin A, Bergström G. Interventions for common mental disorders in the occupational health service: a systematic review with a narrative synthesis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020;93(7):823-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01535-4 PMid:32246230 PMCid:PMC7452923
23. Lagerveld SE, Blonk RW, Brenninkmeijer V, Wijngaards-de Meij L, Schaufeli WB. Work-focused treatment of common mental disorders and return to work: a comparative outcome study. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17(2):220-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027049 PMid:22308965
24. Ministério da Previdência Social (BR). Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social. Reabilitação Profissional [Internet]. Brasília: INSS; 2023 [citado 2026 Jul 21]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/inss/pt-br/direitos-e-deveres/reabilitacao-profissional
25. Corbière M, Mazaniello-Chézol M, Lecomte T, Guay S, Panaccio A. Developing a collaborative and sustainable return to work program for employees with common mental disorders: a participatory research with public and private organizations. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(18):5199-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1931481 PMid:34086528
26. Nielsen K, Yarker J. Thrivers, survivors or exiteers: a longitudinal, interpretative phenomenological analysis of the post-return-to-work journeys for workers with common mental disorders. Appl Psychol. 2024;73(1):267-95. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12479
27. Corbière M, Mazaniello-Chézol M, Lecomte T, Guay S, Panaccio A, Giguère CÉ. Web-enhanced return-to-work coordination for employees with common mental disorders: reduction of sick leave duration and relapse. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):676. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21716-5 PMid:39966766 PMCid:PMC11837585
28. Silva-Junior JS, Martinez MC, Griep RH, Fischer FM. Return to work after a disabling mental disorder: predictors from a Brazilian 1-year longitudinal study. J Occup Environ Med. 2021;63(8):e505-11. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002264 PMid:33990526
29. Victor M, Lau B, Ruud T. Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):745. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3431-0 PMid:27502950 PMCid:PMC4977655
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarha Andrade Lobo de Queiroz, Renata Nayara da Silva Figueiredo, Silvia Stahl Merlin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
























