Normas contínuas para a Escala de Estilos de Decisão (Decision Styles Scale) em uma amostra brasileira

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2021.v11.211

Palavras-chave:

Tomada de decisão, processamento dual, adaptação transcultural, estilos de tomada de decisão

Resumo

Introdução: A Escala de Estilos de Tomada de Decisão é um instrumento desenvolvido para avaliar dois estilos decisórios distintos, o intuitivo/ heurístico vs. o deliberado/racional. Estudos anteriores verificaram que a adaptação brasileira da escala é adequada e apresenta boas propriedades psicométricas. O presente estudo apresenta parâmetros preliminares no formato de normas contínuas para o instrumento. Métodos: Participaram do estudo 1.218 adultos brasileiros com idade entre 18 e 64 anos. Resultados: Os resultados da escala não foram influenciados por idade ou sexo reportado, sendo possível apresentar os resultados em normas contínuas para a amostra global. Conclusão: Os resultados apresentados constituem-se em normas preliminares para a interpretação da versão brasileira do estudo. Novos estudos são necessários para a obtenção de normas com base em amostras representativas da população

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Referências

Schiavon B, Sallum I, Grassi-Oliveira R, Malloy-Diniz L. Julgamento e tomada de decisão: conceitos gerais. In: Malloy-Diniz L, Klume-Schiavon B, Grassi-Oliveira R. Julgamento e tomada de decisão. São Paulo: Pearson; 2018. p. 25-46.

Arvai J, Campbell-Arvai V, Steel P. Decision-making for sustainability: a systematic review of the body of knowledge [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Jul 19]. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d5156083138fd000193c11a/t/5f2efe6e0c19916a4256753a/1596915324664/NBS-Systematic-Review-Decision-Making.pdf

Danziger S, Levav J, Avnaim-Pesso L. Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:6889-92. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018033108

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112190108 - PMid:21482790

Osgood JM. Ego-depletion increases selfish decision making, but may also increase self-conflict and regret about those decisions. J Soc Psychol. 2019;159:417-30.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1505706 - PMid:30142302

Gong X, Sanfey AG. Social rank and social cooperation: impact of social comparison processes on cooperative decision-making. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175472.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175472 - PMid:28388684 PMCid:PMC5384784

Mani A, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zhao J. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science. 2013;341:976-80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238041 - PMid:23990553

Ong Q, Theseira W, Ng IY. Reducing debt improves psychological functioning and changes decision-making in the poor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:7244-9.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810901116 - PMid:30910964 PMCid:PMC6462060

Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 1982. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477

Howard JD, Kahnt T. Causal investigations into orbitofrontal control of human decision making. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021;38:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.013 -

PMid:32864400

Malloy-Diniz L, Fuentes D, Leite WB, Correa H, Bechara A. Impulsive behavior in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: characterization of attentional, motor and cognitive impulsiveness. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13:693-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617707070889 - PMid:17521490

Grassi G, Pallanti S, Righi L, Figee M, Mantione M, Denys D, et al. Think twice: impulsivity and decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Behav Addict. 2015;4:263-72.

https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.039 - PMid:26690621 PMCid:PMC4712760

Malloy-Diniz LF, Neves FS, Abrantes SS, Fuentes D, Corrêa H. Suicide behavior and neuropsychological assessment of type I bipolar patients. J Affect Disord. 2009;112:231-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.019 - PMid:18485487

Camchong J, Endres M, Fein G. Decision making, risky behavior, and alcoholism. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;125:227-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62619-6.00014-8 - PMid:25307578

Svaldi J, Philipsen A, Matthies S. Risky decision-making in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2012;197:112-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.014 - PMid:22421066

Perrain R, Dardennes R, Jollant F. Risky decision-making in suicide attempters, and the choice of a violent suicidal means: an updated meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021;280:241-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.052 - PMid:33220560

Bangma DF, Koerts J, Fuermaier AB, Mette C, Zimmermann M, Toussaint AK, et al. Financial decision-making in adults with ADHD. Neuropsychology. 2019;33:1065-77.

https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000571 - PMid:31343233

Cheng AS, Ting KH, Liu KP, Ba Y. Impulsivity and risky decision making among taxi drivers in Hong Kong: an event-related potential study. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;95:387-94.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.021 - PMid:26748873

Teichman JM, Matsumoto E, Smart M, Smith AE, Tongco W, Hosking DE, et al. Personal finances of residents at three Canadian universities. Can J Surg. 2005;48:27-32.

Medeiros W, Torro-Alves N, Malloy-Diniz LF, Minervino CM. Executive functions in children who experience bullying situations. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1197.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01197 - PMid:27616998 PMCid:PMC5000580

Bradshaw CP, O'Brennan LM, McNeely CA. Core competencies and the prevention of school failure and early school leaving. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2008;122:19-32.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.226 - PMid:19021248

Hamilton K, Shih SI, Mohammed S. The development and validation of the rational an intuitive decision styles scale. J Pers Assess. 2016;98:523-35.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1132426 - PMid:26967981

Cotrena C, Branco LD, Fonseca RP. Adaptation and validation of the Melbourne decision making questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2018;40:29-37.

https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0062 - PMid:29211117

Mouta GS, Pinto AL, Malloy-Diniz LF, Pasian RS. Cross-cultural adaptation, and factor structure of the decision styles scale for Brazil. Curr Res Behav Sci. 2021;2:100039.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100039

Wang X, Shi W, Kim R, Oh Y, Yang S, Zhang J, et al. Persuasion for good: towards a personalized persuasive dialogue system for social good. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics [Internet]. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 2019 [cited 2021 Jul 29]. p. 5635-49. https://www.savethechildren.org/ - https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1566 - PMCid:PMC6507442

McClanahan W, van der Linden S, Ruggeri K. Decision-making style mediates the relationship between trait self-control and self-reported criminal behavior. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;151:109537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109537

Tzini K, Jain K. Unethical behavior under relative performance evaluation: evidence and remedy. Hum Resour Manage. 2018;57:1399-413. - https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21913

The jamovi project. Jamovi [Internet]. 2021. https://www.jamovi.org

Lenhard A, Lenhard W, Suggate S, Segerer R. A continuous solution to the norming problem. Assessment. 2018;25:112-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116656437 - PMid:27371826

Lenhard A, Lenhard W, Gary S. Continuous norming of psychometric tests: a simulation study of parametric and semi-parametric approaches. PLoS One. 2019;14: e0222279.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222279 - PMid:31527877 PMCid:PMC6748442

Lenhard W, Lenhard A. Improvement of norm score quality via regression-based continuous norming. educational and psychological measurement. Educ Psychol Meas. 2021;81:229-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420928457

Hamilton K, Shih SI, Mohammed S. The predictive validity of the decision styles scale: an evaluation across task types. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;119:333-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.009

Parsons K, Butavicius M, Delfabbro P, Lillie M. Predicting susceptibility to social influence in phishing emails. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2019;128:17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.02.007

Cheek NN, Goebel J. What does it mean to maximize? "Decision difficulty," indecisiveness, and the jingle-jangle fallacies in the measurement of maximizing. Judgm Decis Mak. 2020;15:7-24.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-09-20

Como Citar

1.
Pinto AL de CB, Mouta G dos S, Pasian SR, Baldaçara LR, Silva AG da, Malloy-Diniz LF. Normas contínuas para a Escala de Estilos de Decisão (Decision Styles Scale) em uma amostra brasileira. Debates em Psiquiatria [Internet]. 20º de setembro de 2021 [citado 8º de dezembro de 2021];11. Disponível em: https://revistardp.org.br/revista/article/view/211

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>