Normas contínuas para a Escala de Estilos de Decisão (Decision Styles Scale) em uma amostra brasileira

André Luiz de Carvalho Braule Pinto; Gabriel dos Santos Mouta; Sônia Regina Pasian; Leonardo Rodrigo Baldaçara; Antonio Geraldo da Silva; Leandro Fernandes Malloy-Diniz

doi:10.25118/2763-9037.2021.v11.211

Autores/as

André Luiz de Carvalho Braule Pinto Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9589-5756
Gabriel dos Santos Mouta Universidade Federal do Amazonas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5796-9491
Sônia Regina Pasian Universidade de São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2811-6625
Leonardo Rodrigo Baldaçara Universidade Federal do Tocantins https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-8515
Antonio Geraldo da Silva Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3423-7076
Leandro Fernandes Malloy-Diniz Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6606-1354

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2021.v11.211

Palabras clave:

Toma de decisiones, procesamiento dual, adaptación transcultural, estilos de toma de decisiones

Resumen

Introducción: La escala de estilos de toma de decisiones es un instrumento desarrollado para evaluar dos estilos de decisión distintos, el intuitivo / heurístico vs. lo deliberado / racional. Estudios anteriores encontraron que la adaptación brasileña de La escala es adecuada y tiene buenas propiedades psicométricas. Este estudio presenta parámetros preliminares en formato de estándares continuos para el instrumento. Métodos: Participaron en el estudio un total de 1.218 adultos brasileños de entre 18 y 64 años. Resultados: Los resultados de la escala no fueron influenciados por la edad o el sexo reportados, y es posible presentar los resultados en normas continuas para la muestra global. Conclusión: Los resultados presentados constituyen en normas preliminares para la interpretación de la versión brasileña del estudio. Se necesitan nuevos estudios para obtener estándares basados en muestras representativas de la población

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Schiavon B, Sallum I, Grassi-Oliveira R, Malloy-Diniz L. Julgamento e tomada de decisão: conceitos gerais. In: Malloy-Diniz L, Klume-Schiavon B, Grassi-Oliveira R. Julgamento e tomada de decisão. São Paulo: Pearson; 2018. p. 25-46.

Arvai J, Campbell-Arvai V, Steel P. Decision-making for sustainability: a systematic review of the body of knowledge [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Jul 19]. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5d5156083138fd000193c11a/t/5f2efe6e0c19916a4256753a/1596915324664/NBS-Systematic-Review-Decision-Making.pdf

Danziger S, Levav J, Avnaim-Pesso L. Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:6889-92. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018033108 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112190108 - PMid:21482790

Osgood JM. Ego-depletion increases selfish decision making, but may also increase self-conflict and regret about those decisions. J Soc Psychol. 2019;159:417-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1505706 - PMid:30142302

Gong X, Sanfey AG. Social rank and social cooperation: impact of social comparison processes on cooperative decision-making. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175472. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175472 - PMid:28388684 PMCid:PMC5384784

Mani A, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zhao J. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science. 2013;341:976-80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238041 - PMid:23990553

Ong Q, Theseira W, Ng IY. Reducing debt improves psychological functioning and changes decision-making in the poor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:7244-9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810901116 - PMid:30910964 PMCid:PMC6462060

Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 1982. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477

Howard JD, Kahnt T. Causal investigations into orbitofrontal control of human decision making. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021;38:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.013 - PMid:32864400

Malloy-Diniz L, Fuentes D, Leite WB, Correa H, Bechara A. Impulsive behavior in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: characterization of attentional, motor and cognitive impulsiveness. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007;13:693-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617707070889 - PMid:17521490

Grassi G, Pallanti S, Righi L, Figee M, Mantione M, Denys D, et al. Think twice: impulsivity and decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Behav Addict. 2015;4:263-72. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.039 - PMid:26690621 PMCid:PMC4712760

Malloy-Diniz LF, Neves FS, Abrantes SS, Fuentes D, Corrêa H. Suicide behavior and neuropsychological assessment of type I bipolar patients. J Affect Disord. 2009;112:231-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.019 - PMid:18485487

Camchong J, Endres M, Fein G. Decision making, risky behavior, and alcoholism. Handb Clin Neurol. 2014;125:227-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62619-6.00014-8 - PMid:25307578

Svaldi J, Philipsen A, Matthies S. Risky decision-making in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2012;197:112-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2012.01.014 - PMid:22421066

Perrain R, Dardennes R, Jollant F. Risky decision-making in suicide attempters, and the choice of a violent suicidal means: an updated meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021;280:241-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.052 - PMid:33220560

Bangma DF, Koerts J, Fuermaier AB, Mette C, Zimmermann M, Toussaint AK, et al. Financial decision-making in adults with ADHD. Neuropsychology. 2019;33:1065-77. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000571 - PMid:31343233

Cheng AS, Ting KH, Liu KP, Ba Y. Impulsivity and risky decision making among taxi drivers in Hong Kong: an event-related potential study. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;95:387-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.021 - PMid:26748873

Teichman JM, Matsumoto E, Smart M, Smith AE, Tongco W, Hosking DE, et al. Personal finances of residents at three Canadian universities. Can J Surg. 2005;48:27-32.

Medeiros W, Torro-Alves N, Malloy-Diniz LF, Minervino CM. Executive functions in children who experience bullying situations. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01197 - PMid:27616998 PMCid:PMC5000580

Bradshaw CP, O'Brennan LM, McNeely CA. Core competencies and the prevention of school failure and early school leaving. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2008;122:19-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.226 - PMid:19021248

Hamilton K, Shih SI, Mohammed S. The development and validation of the rational an intuitive decision styles scale. J Pers Assess. 2016;98:523-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1132426 - PMid:26967981

Cotrena C, Branco LD, Fonseca RP. Adaptation and validation of the Melbourne decision making questionnaire to Brazilian Portuguese. Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2018;40:29-37. https://doi.org/10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0062 - PMid:29211117

Mouta GS, Pinto AL, Malloy-Diniz LF, Pasian RS. Cross-cultural adaptation, and factor structure of the decision styles scale for Brazil. Curr Res Behav Sci. 2021;2:100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2021.100039

Wang X, Shi W, Kim R, Oh Y, Yang S, Zhang J, et al. Persuasion for good: towards a personalized persuasive dialogue system for social good. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics [Internet]. Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics. 2019 [cited 2021 Jul 29]. p. 5635-49. https://www.savethechildren.org/ - https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1566 - PMCid:PMC6507442

McClanahan W, van der Linden S, Ruggeri K. Decision-making style mediates the relationship between trait self-control and self-reported criminal behavior. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;151:109537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109537

Tzini K, Jain K. Unethical behavior under relative performance evaluation: evidence and remedy. Hum Resour Manage. 2018;57:1399-413. - https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21913

The jamovi project. Jamovi [Internet]. 2021. https://www.jamovi.org

Lenhard A, Lenhard W, Suggate S, Segerer R. A continuous solution to the norming problem. Assessment. 2018;25:112-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116656437 - PMid:27371826

Lenhard A, Lenhard W, Gary S. Continuous norming of psychometric tests: a simulation study of parametric and semi-parametric approaches. PLoS One. 2019;14: e0222279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222279 - PMid:31527877 PMCid:PMC6748442

Lenhard W, Lenhard A. Improvement of norm score quality via regression-based continuous norming. educational and psychological measurement. Educ Psychol Meas. 2021;81:229-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420928457

Hamilton K, Shih SI, Mohammed S. The predictive validity of the decision styles scale: an evaluation across task types. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;119:333-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.009

Parsons K, Butavicius M, Delfabbro P, Lillie M. Predicting susceptibility to social influence in phishing emails. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2019;128:17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.02.007

Cheek NN, Goebel J. What does it mean to maximize? "Decision difficulty," indecisiveness, and the jingle-jangle fallacies in the measurement of maximizing. Judgm Decis Mak. 2020;15:7-24.