Indirect psychiatric opinion as a legitimate instrument in contemporary forensic psychiatry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2026.v16.1565Keywords:
forensic psychiatry, indirect psychiatric opinion, medico-legal evaluation, civil capacity, medical ethicsAbstract
Indirect psychiatric evaluation is a relevant tool in forensic psychiatry, especially when in-person assessment is not feasible. Its validity depends on the quality of the sources consulted. Although the absence of a direct clinical examination limits the conclusions, it is still possible to formulate a technical judgment. Methodological transparency is essential to ensure the scientific robustness of the document. Thus, indirect evaluation should be understood as a legitimate tool of forensic practice, and not as an exceptional resource.
Downloads
Metrics
References
1. Conselho Federal de Medicina. Resolução CFM nº 2.381 de 20 de junho de 2024. Normatiza a emissão de documentos médicos e dá outras providências [Internet]. Brasília: CFM, 2024. https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/resolucao-cfm-n-2.381-de-20-de-junho-de-2024-569303790
2. Kroll J, Pouncey C. The Ethics of APA's Goldwater Rule. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2016;44(2):226-35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27236179/ PMID: 27236179
3. Valença AM, Telles LE, Barros A, Silva AG. Perícia psiquiátrica em tempos de Covid-19. Debates em Psiquiatr. 2020;10(4):6-8. https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2020.v10.19
4. Saffi F. Tomada de decisão e capacidade legal em pacientes portadores do transtorno bipolar [Tese na internet]. São Paulo: USP; 2022. https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/47/47135/tde-31052022-165806/publico/saffi_do.pdf
5. Brasil. Lei nº 13.787, de 27 de dezembro de 2018. Dispõe sobre a digitalização e a utilização de sistemas informatizados para a guarda, o armazenamento e o manuseio de prontuário de paciente [Internet]. Brasília: Presidência da República; 2018. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/l13787.htm
6. Taborda JG, Abdalla-Filho E, Chalub M. Psiquiatria Forense. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2022.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eduardo Henrique Teixeira, Thiago Cabral Pereira, Alexandre Martins Valença
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
