Desenvolvimento do teste de planejamento Torre de Londres – versão brasileira (TOL-BR)

Alexandre Luiz de Oliveira Serpa; Alberto Pena Pereira Timóteo; Emanuel Henrique Gonçalves Querino; Leandro F. Malloy-Diniz

doi:10.25118/2763-9037.2019.v9.45

Autores/as

Alexandre Luiz de Oliveira Serpa Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie e Meta Cognitiv, São Paulo, SP. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1924-2128
Alberto Pena Pereira Timóteo Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG.
Emanuel Henrique Gonçalves Querino Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG.
Leandro F. Malloy-Diniz Faculdade de Medicina, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG. Departamento de Saúde Mental, Universidade FUMEC, Belo Horizonte, MG.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2019.v9.45

Palabras clave:

Avaliação neuropsicológica, funções executivas, planejamento cognitivo

Resumen

Funções executivas permitem ao indivíduo resolver problemas complexos e lidar com novos contextos. Dentre elas, o planejamento é considerado uma função de alta ordem que está fortemente relacionada aos circuitos frontoestriatais, cujos déficits podem ser encontrados em diversos transtornos, como autismo, transtorno do déficit de atenção com hiperatividade (TDAH) e depressão. Um dos principais instrumentos para avaliar planejamento é a Torre de Londres (ToL), que, apesar de boas qualidades, tem apresentado problemas como efeito teto e baixa capacidade discriminativa em indivíduos normais. O presente estudo visa avaliar as propriedades psicométricas de uma versão computadorizada, brasileira, da Torre de Londres (ToL-BR). Foram testadas todas as possibilidades de itens possíveis no instrumento (35); após as exclusões dos itens com baixo poder discriminativo (rpb ≤ 0,30), ficaram na ToL-BR um total de 19 itens. Os resultados preliminares, somados a estudos anteriores, sugerem que esse instrumento se mostra mais adequado para avaliar pessoas nos níveis inferior a médio das habilidades de planejamento.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Diamond A. Executi ve functi ons. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68.

Langberg JM, Dvorsky MR, Evans SW. What specifi c facets of executi ve functi on are associated with academic functi oning in youth with att enti on-defi cit/hyperacti vity disorder? J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2013;41:1145-59.

Hayashi Y, Foreman AM, Friedel JE, Wirth O. Executi ve functi on and dangerous driving behaviors in young drivers. Transp Res Part F Traffi c Psychol Behav. 2018;52:51-61.

Stro mba ck C, Lind T, Skagerlund K, Va stf ja ll D, Tingho g G. Does self-control predict fi nancial behavior and fi nancial well-being? J Behav Exp Finance. 2017;14:30-8.

Steel P, Svartdal F, Thundiyil T, Brothen T. Examining procrasti nati on across multi ple goal stages: a longitudinal study of temporal moti vati on theory. Front Psychol. 2018;9:327.

De Luca CR, Leventer RJ. Developmental trajectories of executi ve functi ons across the lifespan. In: Anderson V, Jacobs R, Anderson JP, eds. Neuropsychology, neurology, and cogniti on. Executi ve functi ons and the frontal lobes: a lifespan perspecti ve. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis; 2008. p. 23-56.

Van den Heuvel OA, Groenewegen HJ, Barkhof F, Lazeron RH, van Dyck R, Veltman DJ. Frontostriatal system in planning complexity: a parametric functi onal magneti c resonance version of tower of London task. Neuroimage. 2003;18:367-74.

Olde Dubbelink LM, Geurts HM. Planning skills in autism spectrum disorder across the lifespan: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017;47:1148-65.

Boyer BE, Geurts HM, Van der Oord S. Planning skills of adolescents with ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2018;22:46-57.

Martoni RM, de Filippis R, Cammino S, Giuliani M, Risso G, Cavallini MC, et al. Planning functioning and impulsiveness in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018;268:471-81.

Gvirts HZ, Braw Y, Harari H, Lozin M, Bloch Y, Fefer K, et al. Executive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and borderline personality disorder. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30:959-64.

Fu L, Xiang D, Xiao J, Yao L, Wang Y, Xiao L, et al. Reduced prefrontal activation during the Tower of London and Verbal Fluency Task in patients with bipolar depression: a multi-channel NIRS study. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:214.

Holt DV, Wolf J, Funke J, Weisbrod M, Kaiser S. Planning impairments in schizophrenia: specificity, task independence and functional relevance. Schizophr Res. 2013;149:174-9.

Shallice T. Specific impairments of planning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982;298:199-209.

Owen AM, Downes JJ, Sahakian BJ, Polkey CE, Robbins TW. Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia. 1990;28:1021-34.

Nitschke K, Köstering L, Finkel L, Weiller C, Kaller CP. A Meta‐analysis on the neural basis of planning: activation likelihood estimation of functional brain imaging results in the tower of London task. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38:396-413.

Riccio CA, Wolfe ME, Romine C, Davis B, Sullivan JR. The tower of London and neuropsychological assessment of ADHD in adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19:661-71.

Franceschi M, Caffarra P, Savarè R, Cerutti R, Grossi E, Tol Research Group. Tower of London test: a comparison between conventional statistic approach and modelling based on artificial neural network in differentiating fronto-temporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease. Behav Neurol. 2011;24:149-58.

Giovagnoli AR, Parente A, Didato G, Deleo F, Villani F. Expanding the spectrum of cognitive outcomes after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: a prospective study of theory of mind. Epilepsia. 2016;57:920-30.

Boccia M, Marin D, D’Antuono G, Ciurli P, Incoccia C, Antonucci G, et al. The tower of London (ToL) in Italy: standardization of the ToL test in an Italian population. Neurol Sci. 2017;38:1263-70.

Michalec J, Bezdicek O, Nikolai T, Harsa P, Jech R, Silhan P, et al. A comparative study of tower of London scoring systems and normative data. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;32:328-38.

Malloy-Diniz LF, Cardoso-Martins C, Nassif EP, Levy AM, Leite WB, Fuentes, D. Planning abilities of children aged 4 years and 9 months to 8 1/2 years: effects of age, fluid intelligence and school type on performance in the tower of London test. Dement Neuropsychol. 2008;2:26-30.

de Paula JJ, Neves F, Levy Â, Nassif E, Malloy-Diniz LF. Assessing planning skills and executive functions in the elderly: preliminary normative data for the tower of London test. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012;70:828-30.

Souza R, Ignácio FD, Cunha FC, Oliveira DL, Moll J. [Contributions to the neuropsychology of executive behavior: performance of normal individuals on the tower of London and Wisconsin tests]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2001;59:526-31.

Portella MJ, Marcos-Bars T, Rami-Gonzalez L, Navarro-Odriozola V, Gastó-Ferrer C, Salamero M. [Tower of London: mental planning, validity and the ceiling effect]. Rev Neurol. 2003;37:210-3.

Luciana M, Collins PF, Olson EA, Schissel AM. Tower of London performance in healthy adolescents: the development of planning skills and associations with self-reported inattention and impulsivity. Dev Neuropsychol. 2009;34:461-75.

Borges A, Andrade CM, Timóteo AP, Schlottfeldt CG, Querino, EH, Godoy VP, et al. O teste da Torre de Londres: comparação entre a versãotradicional e a aplicação computadorizada. Rev Debates Psiquiatr. 2018;8:30-36.

Krikorian R, Bartok J, Gay N. Tower of London procedure: a standard method and developmental data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 1994;16:840-50.

Humes GE, Welsh C, Retzlaff PD. Development of the Tower of London-revised. Assessment. 1998;5:355-60.

Schnirman GM, Welsh MC, Retzlaff PD. Development of the tower of London-revised. Assessment. 1998;4:355-60.

R Core Team. R: a language and environment for stati sti cal computi ng [Internet]. 2019. www.Rproject.org/

Revelle W. Psych: procedures for personality and psychological research [Internet]. 2019. CRAN.Rproject. org/package=psych

Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. Program FACTOR, v. 10.9.02. Soft ware program [Internet]. 2019 May 2. psico.fcep.urv.es/utilitats/factor/index.html

Timmerman ME, Lorenzo-Seva U. Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychol Methods. 2011;16:209-20.

Ferrando PJ, Lorenzo-SevaU. Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor soluti ons and factor score esti mates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 2018;78:762-80.

Asparouhov T, Muthen B. Simple second order chi-square correcti on [Internet]. 2010 May 2. www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf

Kline R. Principles and practi ce of structural equati on modeling. 4th ed. New York: The Guilford; 2015.

Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equati on modeling [Internet]. 2012 May 24 [cited 2010 Feb 26]. www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/

Epskamp S. semPlot: path diagrams and visual analysis of various SEM packages’ output [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 26]. cran.rproject. org/web/packages/semPlot/index.html

Andrich D. A rati ng formulati on for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43:561-73.

Masters GN. A Rasch model for parti al credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47:149-74.

Mair P, Hatzinger R, Maier MJ. eRm: Extended Rasch Modeling 1.0-0 [Internet]. 2019. erm.rforge. r-project.org/

Mair P, Hatzinger R, Verhelst ND. RaschSampler: rasch sampler. R package version 0.8-8 [Internet]. 2015. CRAN.R-Project.org/package=RaschSampler

Chalmers RP. mirt: a multi dimensional item response theory package for the R environment. J Stat Soft w. 2012;48:1-29.

Golino HF, Gomes CMA, Amantes A, Coelho G. Psicometria contemporânea: compreendendo os modelos Rasch. Belo Horizonte: Livraria do Psicólogo; 2019.

Raizner RD. Raising the ceiling: the tower of London-extended version. Dev Neuropsychol. 2002;21:1-14.

Anderson P, Anderson V, Lajoie G. The Tower of London test: validati on and standardizati on for pediatric populati ons. Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;10:54-65.

Debelak R, Egle J, Köstering L, Kaller CP. Assessment of planning ability: psychometric analyses on the unidimensionality and construct validity of the Tower of London (TOL-F). Neuropsychology. 2016;30:346-60.