Entre a fantasia e a ação: as patologias sexuais na web
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2015.v5.175Palavras-chave:
Internet, parafilias, zoofilia, cibersexualidadeResumo
O acesso à rede mundial de computadores possibilitou que as relações virtuais acontecessem de uma maneira menos compromissada com a realidade e favoreceu a aceitação de práticas sexuais incomuns ou consideradas inadequadas. Atualmente, várias plataformas comunicacionais são alimentadas por usuários, responsáveis por conteúdos que criam interações, troca de materiais e relacionamentos online. Pode-se considerar que a democratização da sexualidade em ambientes virtuais tenha benefícios; porém, o excesso de informação sem critérios e a facilidade de acesso a fotos, vídeos e outros materiais pode causar danos. É possível observar espaços para a divulgação de fantasias parafílicas, entre elas a zoofilia (excitação ou práticas sexualmente excitantes envolvendo animais), que, do ponto de vista médico, é um transtorno de preferência sexual ainda pouco estudado. Estabelecer limites para relacionamentos mediados pela Internet e avaliar a consequência dessa interação na prática não é tarefa fácil, mas necessária.
Downloads
Métricas
Referências
Bancroft J. Human sexuality and its problems. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2009.
Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE. Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1948.
Laier C, Pekal J, Brand M. Cybersex addiction in heterosexual female users of internet pornography can be explained by gratifi cation hypothesis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17:505-11.
Brand M, Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Schachtle U, Scholer T, Altstotter-Gleich C. Watching pornographic pictures on the Internet: role of sexual arousal ratings and psychologicalpsychiatric symptoms for using Internet sex sites excessively. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011;14:371-7.
Southern S. Treatment of compulsive cybersex behavior. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2008;31:697-712.
Kloess JA, Beech AR, Harkins L. Online child sexual exploitation: prevalence, process, andoffender characteristics. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014;15:126-39.
Deirmenjian JM. Pedophilia on the Internet. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47:1090-2.
Seto MC, Cantor JM, Blanchard R. Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006;115:610-5.
Weiss R. The prevalence of porn [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul] http://blogs.psychcentral.com/sex/2013/05/the-prevalence-of-porn/2014
D’Abreu LCF. Pornografi a, desigualdade de gênero e agressão sexual contra mulheres. Psicol Soc. 2013;25:592-601.
Ciclitira K. Pornography, women and feminism: between pleasure and politics. Sexualities. 2004;7:281-301.
Buzzell T. The effects of sophistication, access and monitoring on use of pornography in three technological contexts. Deviant Behav. 2005;26:109-32.
Williams L. Porn studies. Durham: Duke University Press; 2004.
Carroll JS, Padilla-Walker LM, Nelson LJ, Olson CD, Barry CM, Madsen SD. Generation XXX. Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. J Adolesc Res. 2008;23:6-30.
Haggstrom-Nordin E, Hanson U, Tyden T. Associations between pornography consumption and sexual practices among adolescents in Sweden. Int J STD AIDS. 2005;16:102-7.
Benjamin O, Tlusten D. Intimacy and/or degradation: heterosexual images of togetherness and women’s embracement of pornography. Sexualities. 2010;13:599-623.
Goldstein MJ, Kant HS. Pornography and sexual deviance. London: University of California Press; 1973.
McKee A. The objectifi cation of women in mainstream pornographic videos in Australia. J Sex Res. 2005;42:277-90.
Jonas KJ, Hawk ST, Vastenburg D, de Groot P. “Bareback” pornography consumption and safesex intentions of men having sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43:745-53.
Svedin CG, Akerman I, Priebe G. Frequent users of pornography. A population based epidemiological study of Swedish male adolescents. J Adolesc. 2011;34:779-88.
Mattebo M, Tyden T, Haggstrom-Nordin E, Nilsson KW, Larsson M. Pornography consumption, sexual experiences, lifestyles, and self-rated health among male adolescents in Sweden. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013;34:460-8.
Willoughby BJ, Carroll JS, Nelson LJ, Padilla-Walker LM. Associations between relational sexual behaviour, pornography use, and pornography acceptance among US college students. Cult Health Sex. 2014;16:1052-69.
Hald GM, Malamuth NM, Yuen C. Pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women: revisiting the relationship in nonexperimental studies. Aggress Behav. 2010;36:14-20.
Vega V, Malamuth NM. Predicting sexual aggression: the role of pornography in the context of general and specifi c risk factors. Aggress Behav. 2007;33:104-17.
Luder MT, Pittet I, Berchtold A, Akre C, Michaud PA, Suris JC. Associations between online pornography and sexual behavior among adolescents: myth or reality? Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40:1027-35.
Stulhofer A, Busko V, Landripet I. Pornography, sexual socialization, and satisfaction among young men. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:168-78.
Math SB, Viswanath B, Maroky AS, Kumar NC, Cherian AV, Nirmala MC. Sexual crime in India: is it infl uenced by pornography? Indian J Psychol Med. 2014;36:147-52.
Albury K. Porn and sex education, porn as sex education. Porn Studies. 2014;1:172-81.
Short MB, Black L, Smith AH, Wetterneck CT, Wells DE. A review of Internet pornography use research: methodology and content from the past 10 years. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15:13-23.
Baltieri DA, Aguiar AS, de Oliveira VH, de Souza Gatti AL, de Souza Aranha e Silva RA. Validation of the Pornography Consumption Inventory (PCI) in a Sample of Male Brazilian UniversityStudents. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014 Sep 4:1-12. [Epub ahead of print]
Cooper A, Morahan-Martin J, Mathy RM, Maheu M. Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28:105-29.
Goodson P, McCormick D, Evans A. Sex and the Internet: a survey instrument to assess college students’ behavior and attitudes. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2000;3:129-49.
McKenna KYA, Green AS, Smith PK. Demarginalizing the sexual self. J Sex Res. 2001;38:302-11.
Paul B, Shim JW. Gender, sexual affect, and motivations for Internet pornography use. International J Sexual Health. 2008;20:187-99.
Galbreath NW, Berlin FS, Sawyer D. Paraphilias REVISÃO and the Internet. In: Cooper A, editor. Sex and the Internet: a guidebook for clinicians. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2002. p. 187-205.
Rodrigues AD. Comunicação e experiência [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2015 Jan 5]. http://www.bocc.ubi.pt/pag/rodrigues-drianocomunicacao-experiencia.pdf
Rodrigues AD. As novas tecnologias da informação e a experiência [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2015 Jan 5]. http://www.bocc.ubi.pt/pag/rodrigues-adriano-novas-tecnologias.pdf
Ross MW. Typing, doing and being: sexuality and the Internet. J Sex Res. 2005;42:342-52.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria permite que o (s) autor (es) mantenha(m) seus direitos autorais sem restrições. Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria é regida pela licença CC-BY-NC
