Entre a fantasia e a ação: as patologias sexuais na web
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2015.v5.175Palabras clave:
Internet, parafilias, zoofilia, cibersexualidadeResumen
O acesso à rede mundial de computadores possibilitou que as relações virtuais acontecessem de uma maneira menos compromissada com a realidade e favoreceu a aceitação de práticas sexuais incomuns ou consideradas inadequadas. Atualmente, várias plataformas comunicacionais são alimentadas por usuários, responsáveis por conteúdos que criam interações, troca de materiais e relacionamentos online. Pode-se considerar que a democratização da sexualidade em ambientes virtuais tenha benefícios; porém, o excesso de informação sem critérios e a facilidade de acesso a fotos, vídeos e outros materiais pode causar danos. É possível observar espaços para a divulgação de fantasias parafílicas, entre elas a zoofilia (excitação ou práticas sexualmente excitantes envolvendo animais), que, do ponto de vista médico, é um transtorno de preferência sexual ainda pouco estudado. Estabelecer limites para relacionamentos mediados pela Internet e avaliar a consequência dessa interação na prática não é tarefa fácil, mas necessária.
Descargas
Métricas
Citas
Bancroft J. Human sexuality and its problems. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2009.
Kinsey AC, Pomeroy WB, Martin CE. Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1948.
Laier C, Pekal J, Brand M. Cybersex addiction in heterosexual female users of internet pornography can be explained by gratifi cation hypothesis. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17:505-11.
Brand M, Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Schachtle U, Scholer T, Altstotter-Gleich C. Watching pornographic pictures on the Internet: role of sexual arousal ratings and psychologicalpsychiatric symptoms for using Internet sex sites excessively. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011;14:371-7.
Southern S. Treatment of compulsive cybersex behavior. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2008;31:697-712.
Kloess JA, Beech AR, Harkins L. Online child sexual exploitation: prevalence, process, andoffender characteristics. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2014;15:126-39.
Deirmenjian JM. Pedophilia on the Internet. J Forensic Sci. 2002;47:1090-2.
Seto MC, Cantor JM, Blanchard R. Child pornography offenses are a valid diagnostic indicator of pedophilia. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006;115:610-5.
Weiss R. The prevalence of porn [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul] http://blogs.psychcentral.com/sex/2013/05/the-prevalence-of-porn/2014
D’Abreu LCF. Pornografi a, desigualdade de gênero e agressão sexual contra mulheres. Psicol Soc. 2013;25:592-601.
Ciclitira K. Pornography, women and feminism: between pleasure and politics. Sexualities. 2004;7:281-301.
Buzzell T. The effects of sophistication, access and monitoring on use of pornography in three technological contexts. Deviant Behav. 2005;26:109-32.
Williams L. Porn studies. Durham: Duke University Press; 2004.
Carroll JS, Padilla-Walker LM, Nelson LJ, Olson CD, Barry CM, Madsen SD. Generation XXX. Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. J Adolesc Res. 2008;23:6-30.
Haggstrom-Nordin E, Hanson U, Tyden T. Associations between pornography consumption and sexual practices among adolescents in Sweden. Int J STD AIDS. 2005;16:102-7.
Benjamin O, Tlusten D. Intimacy and/or degradation: heterosexual images of togetherness and women’s embracement of pornography. Sexualities. 2010;13:599-623.
Goldstein MJ, Kant HS. Pornography and sexual deviance. London: University of California Press; 1973.
McKee A. The objectifi cation of women in mainstream pornographic videos in Australia. J Sex Res. 2005;42:277-90.
Jonas KJ, Hawk ST, Vastenburg D, de Groot P. “Bareback” pornography consumption and safesex intentions of men having sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43:745-53.
Svedin CG, Akerman I, Priebe G. Frequent users of pornography. A population based epidemiological study of Swedish male adolescents. J Adolesc. 2011;34:779-88.
Mattebo M, Tyden T, Haggstrom-Nordin E, Nilsson KW, Larsson M. Pornography consumption, sexual experiences, lifestyles, and self-rated health among male adolescents in Sweden. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013;34:460-8.
Willoughby BJ, Carroll JS, Nelson LJ, Padilla-Walker LM. Associations between relational sexual behaviour, pornography use, and pornography acceptance among US college students. Cult Health Sex. 2014;16:1052-69.
Hald GM, Malamuth NM, Yuen C. Pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women: revisiting the relationship in nonexperimental studies. Aggress Behav. 2010;36:14-20.
Vega V, Malamuth NM. Predicting sexual aggression: the role of pornography in the context of general and specifi c risk factors. Aggress Behav. 2007;33:104-17.
Luder MT, Pittet I, Berchtold A, Akre C, Michaud PA, Suris JC. Associations between online pornography and sexual behavior among adolescents: myth or reality? Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40:1027-35.
Stulhofer A, Busko V, Landripet I. Pornography, sexual socialization, and satisfaction among young men. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39:168-78.
Math SB, Viswanath B, Maroky AS, Kumar NC, Cherian AV, Nirmala MC. Sexual crime in India: is it infl uenced by pornography? Indian J Psychol Med. 2014;36:147-52.
Albury K. Porn and sex education, porn as sex education. Porn Studies. 2014;1:172-81.
Short MB, Black L, Smith AH, Wetterneck CT, Wells DE. A review of Internet pornography use research: methodology and content from the past 10 years. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15:13-23.
Baltieri DA, Aguiar AS, de Oliveira VH, de Souza Gatti AL, de Souza Aranha e Silva RA. Validation of the Pornography Consumption Inventory (PCI) in a Sample of Male Brazilian UniversityStudents. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014 Sep 4:1-12. [Epub ahead of print]
Cooper A, Morahan-Martin J, Mathy RM, Maheu M. Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28:105-29.
Goodson P, McCormick D, Evans A. Sex and the Internet: a survey instrument to assess college students’ behavior and attitudes. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2000;3:129-49.
McKenna KYA, Green AS, Smith PK. Demarginalizing the sexual self. J Sex Res. 2001;38:302-11.
Paul B, Shim JW. Gender, sexual affect, and motivations for Internet pornography use. International J Sexual Health. 2008;20:187-99.
Galbreath NW, Berlin FS, Sawyer D. Paraphilias REVISÃO and the Internet. In: Cooper A, editor. Sex and the Internet: a guidebook for clinicians. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2002. p. 187-205.
Rodrigues AD. Comunicação e experiência [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2015 Jan 5]. http://www.bocc.ubi.pt/pag/rodrigues-drianocomunicacao-experiencia.pdf
Rodrigues AD. As novas tecnologias da informação e a experiência [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2015 Jan 5]. http://www.bocc.ubi.pt/pag/rodrigues-adriano-novas-tecnologias.pdf
Ross MW. Typing, doing and being: sexuality and the Internet. J Sex Res. 2005;42:342-52.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Debates em Psiquiatria permite que el (los) autor (es) mantenga(n) sus derechos de autor sin restricciones. Permite al (los) autor (es) conservar sus derechos de publicación sin restricciones. Los autores deben garantizar que el artículo es un trabajo original sin fabricación, fraude o plagio; no infringe ningún derecho de autor o derecho de propiedad de terceros. Los autores también deben garantizar que cada uno atendió a los requisitos de autoría conforme a la recomendación del ICMJE y entienden que, si el artículo o parte de él es fallido o fraudulento, cada autor comparte la responsabilidad.
Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria es regida por la licencia CC-BY-NC
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material
El licenciador no puede revocar estas libertades mientras cumpla con los términos de la licencia. Bajo las condiciones siguientes:
- Reconocimiento — Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios<. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace.
- NoComercial — No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial.
No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales o medidas tecnológicas que legalmente restrinjan realizar aquello que la licencia permite.
