Neurosciences, neuroethics and psychiatry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2012.v2.897Keywords:
neuroscience, neuroethics, psychiatry, technologyAbstract
Neuroethics is a subset of bioethics concerned with the ethical issues of neuroscience, cognitive science, and neuroradiology. Research has progressed at an astonishing pace, and as a result, the acquisition and application of knowledge and technology raises practical and philosophical ethical questions. New insights into the mind-brain dilemma and increasingly sophisticated techniques for imaging and intervening in human cognition, emotion, and behavior raise ethical issues at the intersection of technology and psychiatry.
Downloads
References
• 1 Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. The National Academies, Earth & Life Studies, Washington, 2011. Acceso 06/01/ 2012. http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Toward-Precision-Medicine-Building-nowledge/13284,
• 2 World Health Organization. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update (WHO, 2008), WHO Library, Switzerland..
• 3 Grand Challenges in Global Mental Health, NIMH, Nature, 2011, 4 7 5: 1-4.
• 4 Insel TR, Quirion R. Psychiatry as a Clinical Neuroscience Discipline. JAMA, 2005, 294: 2221-24 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.17.2221
• 5 Gabbard G. Será possível integrar a psicoanálise e a pesquisa clínica no futuro?. Rev. psiquiatr. Rio Gd. Sul, vol.29, no.1 Porto Alegre Jan./Apr. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81082007000100007
• 6 Vidal F. Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences. 2009, 22:5-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695108099133
• 7 Lesperance F, Frasure-Smith N, Theroux P, Irwin M. The association between major depression and levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes. Am J Psychiatry, 2004; 161:271–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.271
• 8 Cheung EH. A new ethics of psychiatry: neuroethics, neuroscience, and technology. J Psychiatr Pract. 2009, 15: 391-01. Abstract. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pra.0000361279.11210.14
• 9 Zimmer C. Soul Made flesh: The Discovery ofthe Brain-and How it Changed the World. Free Press Editors, New York, USA; 2004.
• 10 Cranford, R. E. The Neurologist as Ethics Consultant and as a Member of the Institutional Ethics Committee. The Neuroethicist. Neurologic Clinics, 1989, 7: 697-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8619(18)30384-0
• 11 Safire, W. Visiones para un nuevo campo de Neuroética. Actas del Congreso de Neuroética, 13 y 14 mayo de 2002. San Francisco, California, USA.
• 12 Cheshire W. Neuroscie, Nuance and Neuroethics. Ethics & Medicine, 2006, 22: 71-3.
• 13 Nature. Editorial. Neuroethics Needed. Researchers Should Speak Out on Claims Made on Behalf of TheirScience, Nature, 2006, 441, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/441907a
• 14 Greely, H. Editorial. On Neuroethics, Science, 2007,318: 533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150557
• 15 Garnett A, Whiteley L, Piwowar H, Rasmussen E, Illes J.. Neuroethics and fMRI: Mapping a Fledgling Relationship. http://www.plosone.org/article/info PlosOne, 2011. acceso 13/10/2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018537
• 16 Luria, AR. El cerebro en acción. Ed. Fontanella, Barcelona, 1979.
• 17 Greene JD, Sommerville R, Cohen JD. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment, Science, 2001, 293: 2105-08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
• 18 Gazzaniga MS. Human: The science behind what makes us unique. New York, Harper Collins, 2008.
• 19 Gazzaniga, M. Facts, Fictions and the future of neuroethics. Neuroethics. In: Defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy, New York, Illes, J , 2006.
• 20 Wilson EO. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press, 1975.
• 21 Mora, F. Neurocultura. Una cultura basada en el cerebro. Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 2007
• 22 Hauser, M. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York, Ecco/ Harper Collins Publishers, 2006.
• 23 Levy, N. Cognitive Scientific Challenges to Morality. Philosophical Psychology, 2006, 19: 567-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080600901863
• 24 Panese F. The neural basis of what? Discontents in defining “human nature”. Front Hum Neurosc 2009,3:41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.041.2009
• 25 Borgelt E, et al. This is Why you’ve Been Suffering: Reflections of Providers on Neuroimaging in Mental Health Care. J Bioeth Inq, 2011, 8:15-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-010-9271-1
• 26 Green J, et al. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 2004, 359: 1775–85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546
• 27 Berrios GE. El concepto de síntoma mental, In: Hacia una nueva epistemología de la Psiquiatría. Buenos Aires, Editorial Polemos, 2011.
• 28 Mayberg HS, Lozano A. M., Voon V., McNeely H. E., Seminowicz D., Hamani C., Schwalb J. M, et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron, 2005, 45: 651-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.014
• 29 Yang N, Han Y, Pang ZP, Sudhof TC, Wernig M.2004, http://www.ploscollections.org/downloads/plos_medicine_diseasemongering.pdf.
• 40 Rozanes, M. Neuroética psiquiátrica: una asignatura pendiente. Salud Mental, 2009, 32: 435-37.
• 41 Mainetti JA. Bioética del mejoramiento humano. Quirón, 2011, 41: 6-22.
• 42 Casares Serrano AD. El Tiempo y la Hipótesis. William Wheweel y la conformación de las ciencias inductivas. A Parte Rei, 2004, septiembre: 1-29.
• 43 Wilson, Edward O. Consilience: la unidad del conocimiento. Barcelona, Galaxia Gutenberg , Círculo de Lectores, 1999.
• 44 Sánchez-Migallón S. La ambigüedad de la neuroética. Conferencia pronunciada en las Jornadas de Clausura del Master de Bioética Universidad Católica San Antonio, Murcia, España, acceso 13/10/2011. http://www.bioeticacs.org/?dst=neuroetica
• 45 Mojtabai, R.; Olfson, M. National Trends in Psychotherapy by Office-Based Psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2008, 65: 962-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.65.8.962
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Manuel Suárez Richards
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
