Neurociencias, neuroética y psiquiatria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2012.v2.897Palavras-chave:
neurociências, neuroética, psiquiatria, tecnologiaResumo
A neuroética é um subconjunto da bioética preocupado com as questões éticas da neurociência, da ciência cognitiva e da neurorradiologia. A investigação tem progredido a um ritmo surpreendente e, como consequência, a aquisição e aplicação de conhecimento e tecnologia levanta questões éticas de natureza prática e filosófica. Novos insights sobre o dilema mente-cérebro e técnicas cada vez mais sofisticadas para obter imagens e intervir na cognição, emoção e comportamento humano levantam questões éticas na intersecção da tecnologia e da psiquiatria.
Downloads
Métricas
Referências
• 1 Toward Precision Medicine: Building a Knowledge Network Biomedical Research and a New Taxonomy of Disease. The National Academies, Earth & Life Studies, Washington, 2011. Acceso 06/01/ 2012. http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Toward-Precision-Medicine-Building-nowledge/13284,
• 2 World Health Organization. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update (WHO, 2008), WHO Library, Switzerland..
• 3 Grand Challenges in Global Mental Health, NIMH, Nature, 2011, 4 7 5: 1-4.
• 4 Insel TR, Quirion R. Psychiatry as a Clinical Neuroscience Discipline. JAMA, 2005, 294: 2221-24 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.17.2221
• 5 Gabbard G. Será possível integrar a psicoanálise e a pesquisa clínica no futuro?. Rev. psiquiatr. Rio Gd. Sul, vol.29, no.1 Porto Alegre Jan./Apr. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81082007000100007
• 6 Vidal F. Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences. 2009, 22:5-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695108099133
• 7 Lesperance F, Frasure-Smith N, Theroux P, Irwin M. The association between major depression and levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes. Am J Psychiatry, 2004; 161:271–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.271
• 8 Cheung EH. A new ethics of psychiatry: neuroethics, neuroscience, and technology. J Psychiatr Pract. 2009, 15: 391-01. Abstract. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pra.0000361279.11210.14
• 9 Zimmer C. Soul Made flesh: The Discovery ofthe Brain-and How it Changed the World. Free Press Editors, New York, USA; 2004.
• 10 Cranford, R. E. The Neurologist as Ethics Consultant and as a Member of the Institutional Ethics Committee. The Neuroethicist. Neurologic Clinics, 1989, 7: 697-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8619(18)30384-0
• 11 Safire, W. Visiones para un nuevo campo de Neuroética. Actas del Congreso de Neuroética, 13 y 14 mayo de 2002. San Francisco, California, USA.
• 12 Cheshire W. Neuroscie, Nuance and Neuroethics. Ethics & Medicine, 2006, 22: 71-3.
• 13 Nature. Editorial. Neuroethics Needed. Researchers Should Speak Out on Claims Made on Behalf of TheirScience, Nature, 2006, 441, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/441907a
• 14 Greely, H. Editorial. On Neuroethics, Science, 2007,318: 533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150557
• 15 Garnett A, Whiteley L, Piwowar H, Rasmussen E, Illes J.. Neuroethics and fMRI: Mapping a Fledgling Relationship. http://www.plosone.org/article/info PlosOne, 2011. acceso 13/10/2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018537
• 16 Luria, AR. El cerebro en acción. Ed. Fontanella, Barcelona, 1979.
• 17 Greene JD, Sommerville R, Cohen JD. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment, Science, 2001, 293: 2105-08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
• 18 Gazzaniga MS. Human: The science behind what makes us unique. New York, Harper Collins, 2008.
• 19 Gazzaniga, M. Facts, Fictions and the future of neuroethics. Neuroethics. In: Defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy, New York, Illes, J , 2006.
• 20 Wilson EO. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press, 1975.
• 21 Mora, F. Neurocultura. Una cultura basada en el cerebro. Alianza Editorial, Madrid, 2007
• 22 Hauser, M. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York, Ecco/ Harper Collins Publishers, 2006.
• 23 Levy, N. Cognitive Scientific Challenges to Morality. Philosophical Psychology, 2006, 19: 567-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080600901863
• 24 Panese F. The neural basis of what? Discontents in defining “human nature”. Front Hum Neurosc 2009,3:41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.041.2009
• 25 Borgelt E, et al. This is Why you’ve Been Suffering: Reflections of Providers on Neuroimaging in Mental Health Care. J Bioeth Inq, 2011, 8:15-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-010-9271-1
• 26 Green J, et al. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 2004, 359: 1775–85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546
• 27 Berrios GE. El concepto de síntoma mental, In: Hacia una nueva epistemología de la Psiquiatría. Buenos Aires, Editorial Polemos, 2011.
• 28 Mayberg HS, Lozano A. M., Voon V., McNeely H. E., Seminowicz D., Hamani C., Schwalb J. M, et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron, 2005, 45: 651-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.014
• 29 Yang N, Han Y, Pang ZP, Sudhof TC, Wernig M.2004, http://www.ploscollections.org/downloads/plos_medicine_diseasemongering.pdf.
• 40 Rozanes, M. Neuroética psiquiátrica: una asignatura pendiente. Salud Mental, 2009, 32: 435-37.
• 41 Mainetti JA. Bioética del mejoramiento humano. Quirón, 2011, 41: 6-22.
• 42 Casares Serrano AD. El Tiempo y la Hipótesis. William Wheweel y la conformación de las ciencias inductivas. A Parte Rei, 2004, septiembre: 1-29.
• 43 Wilson, Edward O. Consilience: la unidad del conocimiento. Barcelona, Galaxia Gutenberg , Círculo de Lectores, 1999.
• 44 Sánchez-Migallón S. La ambigüedad de la neuroética. Conferencia pronunciada en las Jornadas de Clausura del Master de Bioética Universidad Católica San Antonio, Murcia, España, acceso 13/10/2011. http://www.bioeticacs.org/?dst=neuroetica
• 45 Mojtabai, R.; Olfson, M. National Trends in Psychotherapy by Office-Based Psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2008, 65: 962-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.65.8.962
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2012 Manuel Suárez Richards
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria permite que o (s) autor (es) mantenha(m) seus direitos autorais sem restrições. Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria é regida pela licença CC-BY-NC
