Mudanças apontadas no DSM-5 em relação aos transtornos específicos de aprendizagem em leitura e escrita
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2236-918X-6-3-4Keywords:
Dyslexia, diagnosis, readingAbstract
The new version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), published in 2013, brought important changes to the classification of neurodevelopmental disorders, especially specific learning disorders. This paper critically describes the differences found in the latest version compared to 4th edition (DSM-IV). Overall, there were changes in relation to diagnostic criteria, in the terminology employed, as well as in the important recommendation to use the response to intervention paradigm to confirm diagnostic hypotheses of specific learning disorders, like dyslexia.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Lyon GR, Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA. A defi niti on of dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia. 2003;53:1-15.
American Psychiatric Associati on. Diagnosti c and Stati sti cal Manual of Mental Disorders, Fift h Editi on (DSM-5). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
Koulopoulou A. P01-221 - Anxiety and depression symptoms in children-commorbidity with learning disabiliti es. Eur Psychiatry. 2010;25:432.
Fuchs LS, Vaughn S. Responsiveness-tointerventi on: a decade later. J Learn Disabil. 2012;45:195-203.
Cavendish W. Identi fi cati on of learning disabiliti es: implicati ons of proposed dsm-5 criteria for schoolbased assessment. J Learn Disabil. 2013;46:52-7.
Fletcher JM, Lyon GR, Fuchs LS, Barnes MA. Learning disabiliti es: from identi fi cati on to interventi on. New York: Guilford; 2007.
Mousinho R. Transtornos específi cos de aprendizagem – dislexia. In: Marquesan I, Silva H, Tomé M. Tratado das especialidades em fonoaudiologia. São Paulo: Grupo Editorial Nacional; 2014. p. 583-92.
Navas ALGP. Annual research review: the nature and classifi cati on of reading disorders--a commentary on proposals for DSM-5. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;17:370-1.
Share DL. On the Anglocentriciti es of current reading research and practi ce: the perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychol Bull. 2008;134:584-615.
Shaywitz SE, Morris R, Shaywits BA. The educati on of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:451-75.
Rodrigues JC, Salles JF. Tarefa de escrita de palavras/pseudopalavras para adultos: abordagem da neuropsicologia cogniti va. Let Hoje. 2013;48:50-8.
Schwanenglugel PJ, Hamilton AM, Wisenbaker JM, Kuhn MR, Stahl SA. Becoming a fl uent reader: reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. J Educ Psychol. 2004;96:119-29.
Salles JF. Compreensão de leitura textual entre crianças com e sem difi culdades de leitura e escrita. In: Barbosa T, Rodrigues CC, Melo CB, Capellini SA, Mousinho R, Mendonça L, org. Temas em dislexia. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2009. p. 103-13.
Geva E, Yaghoub Zadeh Z. Reading effi ciency in nati ve English speaking and English-as-a-secondlanguage children: the role of oral profi ciency and underlying cogniti ve-linguisti c processes. Sci Stud Read. 2006;10:31-57.
Snowling MJ, Hulme C. Annual research review: the nature and classifi cati on of reading disorders-a commentary on proposals for DSM-5. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012;53:593-607.
Gooch D, Snowling M, Hulme C. Time perception, phonological skills and executive function in children with dyslexia and/or ADHD symptoms. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;52:195-203.
Zorzi JL. Aprendizagem e distúrbios da linguagem escrita: questões clínicas e educacionais. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2003.
Mousinho R, Correa J. Conhecimento ortográfico na dislexia fonológica. In: Barbosa T, Rodrigues C, Mello C, Capellini S, Mousinho R, Alves L, org. Temas em dislexia. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2009. p.33-45.
Kolinsky R, Fernandes T. A cultural side effect: learning to read interferes with identity processing of familiar objects. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1224.
Van Dijk TA, Kintsch W. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press; 1983.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 1994.
Tannock R. DSM 5 changes in diagnostic criteria for specific learning disabilities, (SLD): what are the implications? [Internet]. International Dyslexia Association (IDA). 2014 [cited 2016 Mar 28]. dyslexiahelp.umich.edu/sites/default/files/IDA_DSM-5%20Changes.pdf
Lyytinen H, Erskine J. Early identification and prevention of reading problems. learning disabilities. 2006 Feb [cited 2016 Mar 28]. child-encyclopedia.com/sites/default/files/textes-experts/en/897/early-identification-andprevention-of-reading-problems.pdf
Reynolds AE, Caravolas M. Evaluation of the Bangor Dyslexia Test (BDT) for use with Adults. Dyslexia. 2016;22:27-46.
Willcutt EG, DeFries JC, Pennington BF, Olson RK, Smith SD, Cardon LR. Genetic etiology of comorbid reading difficulties and ADHD. In: Plomin R, DeFries JC, Craig IW, McGuffin P, editors. Behavioral genetics in a postgenomic era. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2003. p. 227-46.
Riesgo RS. Transtornos de atençã o: Comorbidades. In: Rotta NT, Ohlweilwe L, Riesgo RS, editores. Transtornos de aprendizagem: abordagem neurobiológica e multidisciplinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2006. p. 347-63.
Dorneles BV, Corso LV, Costa AC, Pisacco NMT, Sperafico YLS, Rohde LAP. Impacto do DSM-5 no diagnóstico de transtornos de aprendizagem em crianças e adolescentes com TDAH: um estudo de prevalência. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2014;27:759-67.
DuPaul GJ, Gormley MJ, Laracy SD. Comorbidity of LD and ADHD: implications of DSM-V for assessment and treatment. J Learn Disabil. 2013;46:43-51.
Cowen CD, Dakin KE. Breaking news & call to action: DSM-5 proposed revisions remove the term dyslexia [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Mar 28]. eida.org/dsm5-revisions/
Susan C, Lowell MA; International Dyslexia Association (IDA). Reading, literacy & learning. In: 63rd Annual IDA Conference; 2012 Oct 24-7; Baltimore, USA. [cited 2016 Mar 28]. pt.slideshare.net/mdconferencefinder/63rdannual-international-dyslexia-ssociationconference-reading-literacy-learning
World Health Organization (WHO). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2016 Mar 28]. who.int/classifications/icf/en/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
