Is psychoanalysis a pseudoscience? Reevaluating the doctrine using a multicriteria list
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25118/2763-9037.2021.v11.58Keywords:
psychoanalysis, psychology, scienceAbstract
Introduction: In the past, psychoanalysis was classified as a pseudoscience. Karl Popper was one of those who objected to the idea that psychoanalysis is a science, using falsifiability. However, falsifiability cannot be considered sufficient anymore, since it carries major weaknesses and better alternatives to address the issue are available. Objective: This article intends to evaluate the scientific status of psychoanalysis concerning the demarcation problem. Method: In order to do so, Sven Ove Hansson’s criteria were used. His proposal consists of a set of sufficient and
necessary conditions which is complemented by a multicriteria list that helps identifying pseudosciences. It was analyzed how much psychoanalysis fits each of Hansson's seven items, besides proposing the addition of an eighth. Results: The results showed that psychoanalysis was compatible with all eight demarcation of pseudoscience’s items. Conclusion: In the end, the conclusion was that even if falsifiability was to be dismissed, the evidence suggests that there are still enough reasons to affirm that psychoanalysis is a pseudoscience, since it significantly deviates from scientific quality standards.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Laplanche J, Pontalis J-B. Vocabulário da Psicanálise. 9ª ed. São Paulo: Livraria Martins Fontes, 1986.
Popper KR. Conjecturas e Refutações: O Progresso do Conhecimento Científico. 5ª ed. Brasília: UNB, 2008.
Grünbaum A. Popper's fundamental misdiagnosis of the scientific defects of Freudian psychoanalysis and of their bearing on the theory of demarcation. Psychoanal Psychol. 2008;25:574-89. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013540
Cioffi F. Pseudoscience: the case of Freud's sexual etiology of the neuroses. In: Pigliucci M, Boudry M, editors. Philosophy of pseudoscience: reconsidering the demarcation problem. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press; 2013. p. 321-40. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0018
Newton-Smith WH. The Rationality of Science. London e New York: Routledge, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203046159
Hansson SO. Disciplines, Doctrines, and Deviant Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 2020;33:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2020.1831258
Hansson SO. Defining Pseudoscience and Science. In: Pigliucci M & Boudry M, editores. Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago e London: The University of Chicago Press; 2013. p. 61-78. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226051826.003.0005
Hansson SO. Vetenskap och ovetenskap. Stockholm: Tiden, 1983.
Crews F. Freud: The Making of an Illusion. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2017.
Buekens F, Boudry M. The Dark Side of the Loon. Explaining the Temptations of Obscurantism. Theoria. 2014;81:126-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12047
Dersken AA. The Seven Strategies of the Sophisticated Pseudo-Scientist: A Look into Freud's Rhetorical Tool Box. J Gen Philos Sci. 1993;32:329-50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100717113
Borch-Jacobsen M. Les patients de Freud: Destins. Auxerre: Science Humaines, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3917/sh.jacob.2011.01
Figueiredo LC. A Psicanálise e a clínica contemporânea. Contemporânea: Psicanálise e Transdisciplinaridade. 2009;15:9-17. http://www.revistacontemporanea.org.br/revistacontemporaneaanterior/site/wp-content/artigos/artigo202.pdf
Paris J. An Evidence-Based Critique of Contemporary Psychoanalysis: Research, Theory, and Clinical Practice. London e New York: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020674
Schmidt S. Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences. Rev Gen Psychol. 2009;13:90-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108
Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
Spence DP. Dangers of Anecdotal Reports. J Clin Psychol. 2001;57:37-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(200101)57:1<37::AID-JCLP5>3.0.CO;2-S
Callegaro MM. O Novo Inconsciente: Como a Terapia Cognitiva e as Neurociências Revolucionaram o Modelo do Processamento Mental. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2011.
Ramus F. What's the point of neuropsychoanalysis?. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;203:170-1. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.113.127217 PMid:23999480
Bastos LADM. Psicanálise baseada em evidências?. Physis. 2002;12:391-408. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-73312002000200011
Guerra AMC. Psicanálise e Produção Científica. In: Neto FK & Moreira JO, organizadores. Pesquisa em Psicanálise: Transmissão na Universidade. Barbacena: EdUEMG; 2010. p. 130-145.
Lage SFL. Dilthey e Freud: A psicanálise frente à epistemologia das ciências do espírito [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro: Repositório Maxwell; 2003. https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.4047
Neves TI. A Cura em Psicanálise como Potência Política de Transformação [tese]. Recife: Universidade Católica de Pernambuco; 2018. http://tede2.unicap.br:8080/handle/tede/995
Dunker CIL, Peron PR. Usos e sentidos da cura na psicanálise de Freud. Percurso. 2002;83-9.
Neves TI, Lopes AM, Moraes TCB. Reintroduzindo o sintoma: a psicanálise como obstáculo à cientificização do tratamento psíquico. Estud. Pesqui. Psicol. 2013;13:237-53. https://doi.org/10.12957/epp.2013.7934
Fink B. The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400885671
Sgarioni MM, D'Agord MRL. Ciência, verdade e saber na sociedade moderna: uma perspectiva psicanalítica. Clín Cult. 2013;2:3-15. https://seer.ufs.br/index.php/clinicaecultura/article/view/926
Fearon RMP, Roisman GI. Attachment theory: Progress and future directions. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;15:131-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.002 PMid:28813253
Leichsenring F, Rabung S. Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:1551-65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.13.1551 PMid:18827212
Littell JH, Shlonsky A. Making Sense of Meta-Analysis: A Critique of "Effectiveness of Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy". Clin Soc Work J. 2010;39:340-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-010-0308-z
Fonagy P. An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis. International Psychoanalytical Association, 2002. [citado 26 Jan 2021]. https://www.ipa.world/ipa/IPA_Docs/Open%20Door%202002.pdf
Dragioti E, Karathanos V, Gerdle B, Evangelou E. Does psychotherapy work? An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017;136:236-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12713 PMid:28240781
Hobson A. Psychodynamic Neurology: Dreams, Consciousness, and Virtual Reality. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: CRC Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17676
Rofé Y. Does repression exist? Memory, pathogenic, unconscious and clinical evidence. Rev Gen Psychol. 2008;12:63-85. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.63
Horwitz AV, Widom CS, Mclaughlin J, White HR. The Impact of Childhood Abuse and Neglect on Adult Mental Health: A Prospective Study. J Health Soc Behav. 2001;42:184-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090177
Rillaer JV. Os Benefícios da Psicanálise. In: Meyer C, organizadora. O Livro Negro da Psicanálise. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira; 2014. p. 147-162.
Grant DC, Harari E. Psychoanalysis, Science and the Seductive Theory of Karl Popper. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005;39:446-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01602.x PMid:15943645
Boudry M, Buekens F. The Epistemic Predicament of a Pseudoscience: Social Constructivism Confronts Freudian Psychoanalysis. Theoria. 2011;77:159-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2011.01098.x
Frosh S. For and Against Psychoanalysis. London e New York: Routledge, 2006.
Borch-Jacobsen M. Uma Teoria Zero. In: Meyer C, organizadora. O Livro Negro da Psicanálise. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira; 2014. p. 137-142.
Priszkulnik L. Prevenção: saúde mental e psicanálise. Proceedings of the 7th Formação de Profissionais e a Criança-Sujeito. LEPSI IP/FE-USP, 2009. http://www.proceedings.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=MSC0000000032008000100002&script=sci_arttext
Nasio J-D. Como trabalha um psicanalista? Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1999.
Neves TI. O universalismo da cura em Freud. Ágora (Rio J. Online). 2020;23:21-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-44142020001003
Safatle V. O circuito dos afetos. São Paulo: Cosac Naify, 2015.
Lacan J. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book III, The Psychoses. Miller J, editor. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1997.
Fontes FF. A crítica à psicanálise: Um capítulo censurado? Psicol rev. 2014;20:446-59. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.1678-9523.2014V20N3P446
Clifford WK. A Ética da Crença. In: Murcho D, organizador. A Ética da Crença. Lisboa: Bizâncio, 2010. p. 97-136.
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Clarice de Medeiros Chaves Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Debates em Psiquiatria allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) - Debates em Psiquiatria is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
